Support the Café
Search our site

Connecticut bishop seeks agreement with breakaway parish

Connecticut bishop seeks agreement with breakaway parish

From the Hartford Courant:

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision this week not to hear the case of a conservative Episocopal parish in Groton, Conn. that split from the larger church, Connecticut’s Episcopal bishop said Wednesday that the diocese is trying to reconcile with the breakaway congregation.


The high court said Monday that it would not hear arguments about whether the Bishop Seabury Church in Groton should have to return property to the Episcopal diocese, which it left in 2007. The state Supreme Court ruled last year that the 136-year-old parish had to return the property — the 6.5-acre church site, the sanctuary and its contents.

Bishop Ian T. Douglas of the Connecticut Diocese said Wednesday that of the five other parishes in the state that broke from the church, two have closed down, two have rejoined the church under his supervision and another is negotiating its return under supervision.

“The rate of parishes leaving has been in decline,” Douglas said. “If anything it’s been just the opposite, parishes seeking to have reconciled relationships.”

The Episcopal Church has more than 170 parishes in Connecticut.

Douglas said he is now starting talks with the leader of the Groton congregation, Father Ronald Gauss, about five options the parish has for returning to the church.

Those options could allow the parish to be overseen by Douglas or another bishop within the Episcopal Church. The Groton parishioners also could become part of the Catholic Church but still be affiliated with the Episcopal Church and then rent their current building from the Episcopal diocese.

The Groton parish could even incorporate as a congregation separate from the Episcopal Church, but Douglas said renting buildings to groups that do that has been “generally discouraged” across the church, meaning Seabury would likely have to move from its current premises.

Or, Douglas said, the Groton parishoners could simply leave the Episcopal Church and worship elsewhere.

But he said the diocese would not object to having a parish that disagrees with some of its policies, such as ordaining homosexual bishops, if its members hold the same core Christian beliefs.

“We do not all march to the exact same tone in the way that we subscribe to our faith, yet we all would subscribe to the same creedal foundations of the faith,” Douglas said.

If Bishop Seabury Church in Groton were to reconcile with the Diocese, Gauss would most likely have to leave, as he was deposed of his standing in the Episcopal Church when his parish broke away. Read entire story here.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christi Hill

Thanks for your question, JCF. I thought I’d read incorrectly. And there certainly shouldn’t be any lack of RCC churches. In my small town, they’ve shut down 3 of the 4 buildings.

tgflux

Those options could allow the parish to be overseen by Douglas or another bishop within the Episcopal Church. The Groton parishioners also could become part of the Catholic Church but still be affiliated with the Episcopal Church and then rent their current building from the Episcopal diocese.

The Groton parish could even incorporate as a congregation separate from the Episcopal Church, but Douglas said renting buildings to groups that do that has been “generally discouraged” across the church, meaning Seabury would likely have to move from its current premises.

You can’t stay (by renting) in your property if you’re “Anglican”, but you can if you’re (affiliated w/ the) RCC? I don’t understand this. The RCC should have PLENTY of property to host these disaffected Episcopalians, should they choose to swim the Tiber!

JC Fisher

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café