by Jim Papile
Following up on the Café conversation, September 15-17, on the practice of calling one’s cleric Father, Mother, Reverend, etc., I have been thinking about the other public aspects of ordained ministry, like the clerical collar. Has the frequency of wearing, or the reasons for wearing a dog collar changed as the Church has/is changing?
After some quick research it seems that the practice of clergy of many denominations wearing white collars about 150 years old or so. In the Anglican world it was customary for men to wear a white tie, something like a cravat around their necks, look for the local vicar in a Jane Austin film. There is some evidence that Roman priests began to wear collars by protecting their necks from the rough edges of wool cassock collars by adding linen collarettes. Whatever the reason, practical or arcane, the practice stuck.
Being an ordained person in the Diocese of Virginia, I am aware that there are regional, and theological differences in the practice of wearing a strip of white material around one’s neck, an essentially uncomfortable practice, I have found. “Low Church,” ministers have long gone for non-clerical neckwear for men, the bow-tie is often jokingly referred to as the clerical neckwear of choice for male priests in Virginia. “High Church,” Anglo-Catholic types routinely choose the tab style, one inch of white plastic in a band of black shirt material. There seems to be a north, south thing going on too, but that may coincide with the church-personship aspects described above. Fewer collars in the South, more in the North.
There is also the considerations of who wears a collar when. Not withstanding the old joke that the curate wears a collar in the shower, some clergy wear collars at all public functions, say a school concert their child is participating in, some wear them to work every day, some wear them most work days, some only on Sunday. What about the demographics? Do women wear collars more often than men? Older priests, say over fifty more often than those under fifty?
I do a lot of my work outside of the church building these days. Book groups in coffee houses, theology discussions in restaurants, or just sitting in a local Starbucks working on a sermon. What are the pros and cons of wearing a collar in public places. I think over the years it’s been about fifty-fifty, wearing a collar on an airplane; some, always, some never. There is extensive evidence that the nature of the Christian/Post-Christian world is changing, rapidly. I wonder if attitudes about clergy attire is changing too? Are collars helpful or off-putting in seeking the un-churched? Do clergy use them as symbols of authority and power, or are they, like a wise friend once said, “great screens on which many put their projections.
Jim Papile is rector of St. Anne’s Reston Virginia. Originally from Boston, he is a proud member of Red Sox Nation.
All Content © 2017 Episcopal Café
I myself really like that the priests of our parish do. To me it identifies them as priests, it reminds me I can confide in them and know what I discuss is kept in confidence.
When I see them in public, I see those collars as marketing, and when I see them at gay pride events I know they are representing the Church and the Faith in a loving way–contrary to the views a lot of gay people have of the only Christian collar wearers are RC priests.
If you want your collar to kill fleas and ticks for 90 days, you have to sea it every day. I thought everybody knew that.
[please sign your name when you comment, Steve. Thanks]
I like it when I see priests in collars in public; to me it’s sort of like a low hum underneath ordinary reality, reminding us of the faith the church proclaims.
As well, in the case of Catholic priests, it inspires a kind of trust and confidence that I think comes from “the Seal of the Confessional” – knowing that you could talk to this person in complete confidence if you needed to.
And then there are instances like the case of the “mystery priest” at the train crash in Missouri, who anointed an injured woman at the site and then disappeared. (Never mind the collar; he had his anointing oil with him!)
I always wear it on picket lines, at press conferences and in pride parades: where the “outward and visible sign” of clergy presence makes a statement in support of justice, equality and compassion.
I wear it less and less often on campus, in informal worship settings (noonday Eucharist, for example, with four of us in a circle in the chapel) and for business-of-the-church meetings.
And, to be completely honest, some days I wear it when I’m struggling to make the full stature of my life in Christ thing happen … because I’m actually a better priest than I am a person and so wearing the collar reminds me not to make Jesus look bad.
I do know when I was in San Pedro — a profoundly Roman Catholic community — the collar was widely recognized as a symbol of “public Christian” … even if some of them called me “Sister.” In Pasadena … not so much.
Finally … really resist the Mother/Father thing … isn’t the custom at All Saints in Pasadena … hasn’t been for decades … and I’m all for dismantling the patriarchy at every possible opportunity. Thanks for asking!
The Reverend Canon Susan Russell
All Saints Church, Pasadena (Diocese of Los Angeles)
I wear a collar most working days, which means wearing it out to restaurants, stores, etc. I like the statement it makes about “being a public Christian,” but I’m not sure how effective it is in the case of women clergy. People who would look at a man in a collar and understand its meaning don’t necessarily recognize the same thing on a woman. I think many people assume a clerical collar on a woman is just some sort of odd fashion accessory (or medical device?). Nevertheless, I doggedly persist.
Susan Brown Snook