Support the Café
Search our site

Church of England statement on the Rt Revd George Bell (1883-1958)

Church of England statement on the Rt Revd George Bell (1883-1958)

A statement on a case of child sexual abuse dating back to the 1940s and 1950s was issued today by the Church of England. The Rt Revd George Bell is honored by commemoration in both the Church of England and in the Episcopal Church on the anniversary of his death, October 3rd.

On the Diocese of Chichester website, the announcement is annotated by this personal comment from the Bishop of Chichester, the Rt Revd Dr Martin Warner:

The statement to follow communicates news that has brought us a bewildering mix of deep and disturbing emotions. In touching the legacy and reputation of George Bell, it yields a bitter fruit of great sadness and a sense that we are all diminished by what we are being told.

Our starting point is response to the survivor. We remain committed to listening to all allegations of abuse with an open mind. In this case, the scrutiny of the allegation has been thorough, objective, and undertaken by people who command the respect of all parties. We face with shame a story of abuse of a child; we also know that the burden of not being heard has made the experience so much worse. We apologise for the failures of the past.

The revelation of abuse demands bravery on the part of a survivor, and we respect the courage needed to tell the truth. We also recognise that telling the truth provides a legitimate opportunity for others to come forward, sometimes to identify the same source of abuse.

We also believe that in the Church of England as a whole, and certainly in the diocese of Chichester, we have done all we can to ensure that our safeguarding policies reflect best practice, and are fully and evenly implemented. The statement below speaks of an earlier report of this case, in the 1990’s. There will no doubt be some who allege a cover-up by the Church. We acknowledge that the response then would not be adequate by today’s standards, although that falls far short of a cover-up. In the present context, the diocese of Chichester has worked with Police and other agencies to ensure that we have sought the fullest understanding possible of what happened.

Please hold in your prayers all victims of abuse, especially those who have never been able to seek or receive help and a proper response. Please pray for all who are affected by this news, especially those who are our ecumenical partners, those unable to comprehend its implications, and those whose faith is damaged by it. Please pray for the diocese of Chichester, for each other, lay and ordained, as we seek to remain faithful to our apostolic mission in spite of much that could discourage and deter us.

+Martin

Bishop Warner alludes to the change in safeguarding policies and standards between the time of the offences, the time of their first reporting in the 1990s, and the present day. The Church of England statement includes part of his personal response to the victim in this case:

The survivor first reported the abuse to the then Bishop of Chichester, Eric Kemp, in August 1995. Bishop Kemp responded to the correspondence offering pastoral support but did not refer the matter to the police or, so far as is known, investigate the matter further. It was not until contact with Lambeth Palace in 2013 that the survivor was put in touch with the safeguarding team at the Diocese of Chichester who referred the matter to the police and offered personal support and counselling to the survivor.

In his letter to the survivor Bishop Warner acknowledges that the response from the Diocese of Chichester in 1995, when the survivor first came forward, “fell a long way short, not just of what is expected now, but of what we now appreciate you should have had a right to expect then.”

The Church statement included words from the survivor’s solicitor:

Tracey Emmott, the solicitor for the survivor, today issued the following statement on behalf of her client:

“The new culture of openness in the Church of England is genuinely refreshing and seems to represent a proper recognition of the dark secrets of its past, many of which may still not have come to light.  While my client is glad this case is over, they remain bitter that their 1995 complaint was not properly listened to or dealt with until my client made contact with Archbishop Justin Welby’s office in 2013.  That failure to respond properly was very damaging, and combined with the abuse that was suffered has had a profound effect on my client’s life.  For my client, the compensation finally received does not change anything.  How could any amount of money possibly compensate for childhood abuse?  However, my client recognises that it represents a token of apology.  What mattered to my client most and has brought more closure than anything was the personal letter my client has recently received from the Bishop of Chichester.”

The statement, which we found via Thinking Anglicans, is on the Church of England website, and along with Bishop Warner’s comments on the Diocese of Chichester site.

George Kennedy Allen Bell is included in the Episcopal Church calendar of commemorations known as Holy Women, Holy Men: Celebrating the Saints. He is honored as

a major voice in the Church of England during the Second World War and a major figure on the ecumenical stage during the post-war era.

Born in Hampshire in 1883, Bell trained for ordination at Christ Church, Oxford, and Wells Theological College. Ordained to the priesthood in 1908, he served for several years in inner city Leeds among the poor and disenfranchised, and experience that would shape the remainder of his ministry. He became the chaplain to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Randall Davidson, in 1914, becoming Dean of Canterbury in 1924 and Bishop of Chichester in 1929.

HWHM continues to describe Bell’s collaboration with Dietrich Bonhoeffer and hte Confessing Church in Germany during the rise of the Third Reich, and his active assistance to Jews and non-Aryans escaping Nazi Germany.

It has been widely presumed that his outspokem condemnation of hte indscriminate bombing of German cities during hte war cost him the See of Canterbury after the death of Archbishop William Temple in 1944. In the post-was era, Bell was a staunch critic of the cold war and the nuclear arms race.

Bell’s continuing legacy is surely his stature as an ecumenist.

Photo credit: George Bell, via Lambeth Palace Library

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martin Reynolds

This is the second dead English bishop to have been blackened by abuse allegations in recent months
http://europe.anglican.org/downloads/safeguarding/release-for-distribution.doc
It is true that dead people cannot defend their reputations but victims of abuse do need to be believed and helped to find closure.
One wonders, if releasing the information is appropriate, or should both victim and alleged perpetrator stay anonymous?
The fact that the Church has not handled allegations well needs to be said but it does seem that in this case and in the very recent case of Peter Ball a corner has been turned.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Jay Croft

Kick him out of HWHM. We have no place for child abusers.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
JC Fisher

Sadly, I agree.

There is no "right" to publicly-acknowledged sanctity (which is what HMHW is: the closest thing we have to a formal canonization). It's possible that Bishop Bell is innocent. In which case, IF this is an "utter...all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake", God can surely reward him for that in heaven.

But on Earth, we have to deal w/ the probability of Bell's guilt. Kyrie eleison. Lord, bless and heal all victims of child sexual abuse...

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Alan Reed

This incident was reported 37 years after the death of the bishop. We have no way of knowing if the accusation is true, and the bishop, of course, can say nothing to defend himself.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
rick allen

An "apology" issued by a third party is less an apology than another accusation. A finding of sufficient cause to arrest and investigate sets a fairly low evidentiary bar.

Perhaps Bishop Bell did leave some sort of confession to these acts. But if not, a man well deserving of remembrance for his work with the Confessing Church, and for peace and reconciliation after the war, is now publicly branded a child abuser fifty seven years after his death. The Guardian now has a nice headline about Bell being a child abuser, and Wikipedia has dutifully been updated with the accusation and apology.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Nancy C Lea

I wish we could know more about the circumstances of the incident. This could go a long way in trying to understand the Bishop's behaviour as well as the exact nature of the abuse. Clergy are as human and fallible as the rest of us, and sometimes behave out-of-character, therefore, it would help to know more, esp given the other actions of his entire life being so commendable.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
David Allen

None of that has any connection to the issue, then or today. There is no excuse for child sexual abuse, no matter how out-of-character. No matter how much good one is reported to have done.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café