Support the Café

Search our Site

“Christianity deserves better worshippers”

“Christianity deserves better worshippers”

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, a practicing Muslim, begins an essay by decrying the disingenuous use of religion by political power structures as a means to achieve their secular ends. She has extremely harsh words for the theocracy of Iran, and the ruling family of Saudi Arabia. And then she turns to Britain and sees the same behavior by the Prime Minister Dave Cameron:

“Recently, David Cameron did just [the same sort of thing as the Muslim theocracies have done]. The state should be secular, religiously neutral. Yet our PM, once a spin doctor, appropriated divinity efficiently and timed his message precisely. He chose this season of peace and goodwill to rouse muscular, Anglican jingoism, partly to pick a fight again with “multiculturalism” but mostly, I think, to cleanse the many sins of his government. This is a Christian country, with Christian values, he decreed, and “we should not be afraid to say so”. Only it isn’t. When you consider our domestic and foreign policy or how people behave, Britain cannot be called Christian. And I wish it was. Truly I do, even though I am a Muslim. For at its best, Christianity is one of the world’s most humane and tender of religions and deserves a better class of worshipper than many of those who lay claim to it.

There are, of course, Britons who do follow the example of their Lord. I know good believers who shelter asylum-seekers, feed the hungry in soup kitchens, try hard to speak and do no evil, forgive those who hurt them and are not tempted by excessive materialism. They are, though, now diminishing. A major survey in 2010 found a long-term, steady decline in the number of practising Christians in Britain. Fifty per cent said they followed no organised religion. In 1983, that figure was 19 per cent. Among 18- to 24-year-olds, the numbers of disbelievers today is 64 per cent.

[…]If Britain were a more Christian country its people would not tolerate the rich, ruling elite punishing the most disadvantaged with harsh laws and unfair rhetoric. They would revolt against the state-created poverty upon us. They would preserve the welfare state – born at a time when the country was more Christian and understood mutuality and societal obligations. That generosity is gone.

[…]One feels for the truly faithful, such as Archbishops John Sentamu and Rowan Williams and, most of all, the Reverend Giles Fraser, who left St Paul’s when his church threatened to remove forcibly the peaceful people camped outside to protest against the capitalism that devastates economies, lives and the environment. These churchmen try to remind their people of Christ who came to save them, a child born to asylum-seekers. Their words are unheeded. Too many are like Cameron, part-time Christians of convenience, living for mammon, who use their religion as a weapon against those they despise, the poor, helpless and “alien”: all those embraced by Jesus Christ in his time.”

You can (and should) read the whole essay here.

Hat tip to Thinking Anglicans


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John D. Andrews

Excellent article that applies just as much to the United States as it does Great Britain. It’s refreshing to read an article by a Muslim who fears theocracy as much as I do. I believe two of the greatest aspects of the United States is it was founded as a secular nation and guarantees freedom of religion. If the United States or Great Britain were to become Christian nations I believe religious bigotry would increase. I have already seen the negative affect of theocracy on minority religions in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Egypt because of religious bigotry.

jim Beyer


My apologies for the intrusion. I really should know better.


jim Beyer

David Allen

Being Roma himself, I have not known jimB to be predjudiced towards others. I doubt he was referring to Muslims when mentioning shooters and bombers.

Ann Fontaine

Snark does not come through in comments unless set out with some indication. And you may call me Ann.

Priscilla Cardinale

An interesting, thought-provoking essay that presents some rather uncomfortable truths and provides a place to start the New Year’s contemplation for me.

And while I can’t speak for Jim Beyer I took his comment to be snark. Maybe you read it more literally, Ms. Fontaine?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café