Support the Café
Search our site

Catholic laity support their nuns, but will they act to support them?

Catholic laity support their nuns, but will they act to support them?

Margaret Susan Thompson, professor of history at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University, New York, responds to the crackdown on American nuns by the Vatican. Writing in The Tablet, she talks about the contribution Catholic lay religious women have made to the Church’s witness in the US and the support many Catholics feel for the nuns.


The questions left unanswered is whether the laity will act to support them and do laity believe that the hierarchy would listen if they did speak up?

Thompson writes:

US sisters have faced other crises in the past. Two notable ones were the suppression of the Los Angeles, California, IHM Sisters in the late 1960s, and the attempt by Rome to discipline the so-called “Vatican 24” (more than that number of sisters, actually, who signed a 1984 statement published in the New York Times that “faithful Catholics” held a “diversity of opinions” about abortion). But this situation is different. First, it has direct, canonical implications for the relationship of the overwhelming majority of US sisters to the institutional church hierarchy. Second, and perhaps more importantly, it is not happening behind closed doors.

Within moments of the announcement of Sartain’s appointment, the internet exploded. Discussion groups of sisters, of Catholic women, of academics, and of rank-and-file believers began circulating statements, petitions, insights, and any news they might be able to find. Blogs, news sites, Twitter, Facebook, and countless other websites were inundated. The support for sisters has been overwhelming. And it is likely to remain active and engaged for as long as circumstances warrant.

Today’s sisters are both more educated and more socially engaged than either their counterparts in the past or the bulk of the clergy who claim authority over them. And they are not alone. The Catholic laity in the US are also more alert and astute than their forebears were. At a time when the Vatican’s demand that sisters spend less time on “social justice” and more on opposing abortion, contraception, and same-sex marriage, the congruence of this investigation with the current presidential campaign (not to mention the US Supreme Court’s current review of President Obama’s healthcare programme, which most bishops opposed and most LCWR sisters supported) is impossible to ignore.

It is hard to know what that “support” will translate into. There is a considerable gap between the beliefs and action of the average Catholic and the stands taken by their hierarchy. Many Catholics simply ignore what the hierarchy says, or else don’t challenge because they take the hierarchy as a given. Furthermore, many Catholics are taught to believe that their church is the only valid church so if they leave, they don’t consider other churches (like us) who are Christians and aren’t as flawed in our hierarchy.

Our observation through years of public anger over the child sex abuse scandals, church closings, and other controversies, is that there are three choices for the average Catholic: exit, voice and neither. While a handful have joined our church and others denominations, most choose “neither.”

But will this time will be different? Father James Martin, SJ started a Twitter campaign #WhatSistersMeanToMe to drum up support.

“Catholic sisters are my heroes. In light of the Vatican’s desire to renew and reform their main organizing body, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, I thought it would be a great time to speak a word of support for Catholic sisters, and to acknowledge the hidden ways that these women have generously served God, served the poor and served this country.”

Lots and lots of Catholics were educated by nuns and feel affection toward them. Many others recall their work in healthcare. Will that make a difference?

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
janinsanfran

I’m glad to say that I’m seeing an additional option beyond the suggested “three choices for the average Catholic: exit, voice and neither.”

Catholic laity and some clergy are using the “life” mandate from the Catholic Conference to work very hard to end death sentences in California. That is, when there is an option on offer that accords with their consciences, many who love a Church that often seems to ignore their faithfulness find a way. I have a lot of respect for those who take this path.

Jan Adams

Mary Ann Hill

My mother’s family are Bavarian Roman Catholics (mostly lapsed) and whenever I’ve seen “purer” and Benedict in the same sentence, I can’t help but make the connection with facism. And neither can my family. Of the 40+ of them, I can only think of one who actually attends Mass with any regularity.

One way to help the sisters is to donate to Leadership Conference of Women Religious (the body that’s under “reform”) at http://www.lcwr.org/

Paige Baker

I feel for my RC friends who have remained through all the scandals. They love their church. They are often intensely embarrassed by it–but it is their home. For those of us who have struggled with abusive parents, or parents with addictions, the parallel is clear–“The church may be a whore, but she’s my mother,” St. Augustine said.

Pope Benedict has made it quite clear that he would be happy with a “purer” church, even if it is smaller. So what can the laity really do? They will either leave–or they will stay, thereby giving their tacit stamp of approval to what the Vatican does. And it will be because they love their mother.

And Jesus wept….

tgflux

I live in hope that, as the sisters are a much less abstract (more human!) issue than changing mass texts—or even diocesan funding priorities (*cough* sexual-abuse payouts *cough*)—perhaps FINALLY we’ll see RC laity put their feet down?

In the context of the War on Women the Right is conducting generally (from denying birth control to imposing vaginal probes!), I think the sisters have the opportunity to join in and really raise a (empathy-inducing) ruckus.

JC Fisher

[See also the OPEN resistance of clergy&people to their bishops in Washington State, re ssm. Fr Geoff Farrow was all alone in California in 2008 (re Prop8), the resistance is spreading in the Evergreen State: praise Christ!]

Nicole Porter

This might be politically incorrect but I believe that by some (not all) of the RC laity’s silence and unwillingness to act, they have a share in the garbage that goes on.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café