Support the Café

Search our Site

Catholic efforts to address abuse likely to fall short

Catholic efforts to address abuse likely to fall short

From time to time, the Café publishes Letters to the Editor from our readers.  The opinions expressed are the author’s own and are not an expression of the collective opinion of the Café content team. Before submitting an editorial, please check out our Submissions page for guidelines.


from Eric Bonetti


Catholic Efforts to Address Abuse Ignore Lessons from Title IV


One of the sad things about the myriad denominations within Christianity is that they too often fail to learn from one another. And so it is with the recent papal efforts to address abuse. These, while well intentioned, will prove problematic in exactly the same way as The Episcopal Church’s clergy disciplinary canon, Title IV, is inherently flawed.


For starters, much like the recent changes to Title IV, which purport to protect whistle-blowers, the papal decree requires people to blow the whistle on abuse and cover-up. But just as dioceses are already ignoring the whistle-blower protection provisions of Title IV with impunity, the lack of an enforcement mechanism within the papal provisions makes it highly likely that Catholic dioceses will ignore these requirements. In other words, only the truly foolhardy or those with incredible fortitude will risk the reprisals they will face if they come forward with allegations.


Similarly, the requirement in the new Catholic legislation that survivors be treated with respect will quickly fall prey to the advice of attorneys, who will urge diocesan officials not to get too involved. This is common in The Episcopal Church, where dioceses routinely ignore the Title IV requirement of a pastoral response in every case in which a complaint is made to the intake officer, even when a parish is traumatized by the removal of a rector in a Title IV proceeding. This mirrors the finding of the Church of England’s recent report on clergy abuse and Bishop Bell, which found that the needs of survivors were routinely pushed aside in the quest to protect the church’s reputation.


Most importantly, the new Catholic regulations permit bishops to ignore complaints if they are found to be “manifestly unfounded.” This mirrors the materiality provisions of Title IV, which apply a two-pronged test to complaints; they must be both a violation of Title IV and “of weighty and material importance to the ministry of the church.” Given that Episcopal dioceses that wish to avoid dealing with a complaint routinely invoke this clause, even in cases that involve retaliation by clergy and allegations of criminal conduct, one may be confident that Catholic bishops will find myriad behaviors that most of us would consider patently antithetical to Christian values to involve allegations that are “manifestly unfounded.”


In short, while the attention to these issues is to be commended, we remain far from resolution, regardless of the denomination.



0 0 vote
Article Rating

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Downs

What do you suggest? If, as you say, the Church can’t trust those appointed to make Title IV work, what do you suggest? How would you fix this?

Helen Kromm

“In short, while the attention to these issues is to be commended”

I agree with every word you’ve written Eric except the above phrase. I don’t see anything at all to be commended, least of all “attention” to the issue. “Attention” is gutless, cowardly, and impotent when it lacks action and doesn’t enable change.

We both know that after decades of scandal, and with each and every seemingly endless eruption of wide spread abuse and scandal, there is no lack of attention and soothing words from those that hold power. Attention with all of the accompanying expressions of concern and sympathy achieves nothing and has achieved nothing. We only need look at the decades of widespread abuse to know this.

We both know that this attention, and all of the public mea culpas and promises of change, is an instrument to exhibit concern, and foremost and above all else protect the institution.

Saying the attention is commendable lends a generosity to this that is undeserved.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café