Support the Café
Search our site

Breaking: Bishop Packard and others found guilty in OWS v. Trinity, Wall Street

Breaking: Bishop Packard and others found guilty in OWS v. Trinity, Wall Street

Updated

Retired Bishop George Packard and seven other defendants have been found guilty of trespassing for climbing a fence and entering an empty lot owned by Trinity Episcopal Church, Wall Street in December. Packard and six others defendants were sentenced to four days of community service and assessed fines. One defendant, Mark Adams, was sentenced to 45 days in jail. More details to come. You can follow developments on twitter at #D17.


Tweets from Shawn Carrie:

Bishop George Packard now speaking of the disappointment seeing his church @TrinityWallSt help put @emarkadams in jail for 45days

Bishop Packard says in his 70 years as a man of faith, he has never heard a church speak of “No Trespassing” and punishment.

Bishop Packard: “@TrinityWallSt has been portraying itself as this hurt corporate entity, meanwhile pulling the wool over St eyes.

Trinity Wall Street’s most recent statement on the trial, made on June 7, is here.

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori and Bishop Mark Sisk of the Episcopal Diocese of New York released statements in December, just before the events for which Bishop Packard and the others were arrested, supporting Trinity, Wall Street. We will pass on whatever statements they might make.

Update 1 from CNBC:

The one-week trial in Manhattan Criminal Court pitted the church, once a strong ally of the movement, against Occupy supporters, who pressured church leaders not to cooperate with the prosecution.

In the trial before Manhattan Criminal Court Judge Matthew Sciarrino, one defendant, Mark Adams, was also convicted of trying to slice through the fence’s locks with bolt-cutters. Sciarrino sentenced him to 45 days, more than the 30 days that prosecutors had been seeking; he did not offer an explanation. The other seven defendants received four days of community service.

“I’m not shocked, but I’m disappointed that the court felt private property interests trumped our clients’ good-faith defenses,” said Gideon Oliver Orion, one of four defense lawyers.

In finding the protesters guilty, Sciarrino said property rights are as important as freedom of speech. “This was a forceful taking, an invasion, an occupation, pure and simple,” he said.

The Episcopal News Service story is here. It notes that the Rev. Earl Kooperkamp, rector of St. Mary’s Episcopal Church in Harlem, was among the defendants.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nicole Porter

A crime was committed. They were punished for the crime. Sounds like an open and shut case to me.

GrandmèreMimi

Michael, to me, Trinity’s choice was stark and not complicated…to be on the side of the angels or on the side of the greedy bankers and financiers who run our country. Surely the Occupiers represent a very small David taking taking on the Goliath of Wall Street, but they did it anyway.

I wondered, too, what were the demands of the Occupiers, what conditions they wanted met, until I visited the group in New Orleans before they were removed from two public spaces. I talked to the people there and suddenly it clicked. The Occupy folks will not be boxed in by a set of conditions or demands. When I asked the people why they were there, each person had a different reason, but it all came down to the injustice embedded in our political system, which is controlled by the big money folks. We are the 99%.

And I’m sure many of the Occupiers would laugh at my calling them the angels, for they are a messy, loud, and sometimes unsightly bunch. I don’t know but its the kind of situation in which you either get the Occupy movement or you don’t. The light bulb comes on, or it doesn’t.

Still, Trinity’s choice should have been easy, and they chose wrong.

June Butler

Joe Brewer

Michael, okay, as I’ve told you before on this site, OWS believes the political system as it stands to be corrupt and influenced by money and corporate interest. They prefer direct actions. They won’t be fielding candidates. They’re not going to be co-opted by a political party a la the Tea Party.

What they stand for is published here: http://occupywallst.org/about/

This is a leaderless movement. That might be hard to picture, so it will likely not meet your traditional requirements of a movement. This is something different, and it certainly has “juice” here in New York, as it has brought awareness to income inequality.

If you want to learn about the movement by mainstream media, you won’t learn much. You will end up seeing it for what you do.

Adam Spencer

Making Earl Kooperkamp and Bishop Packard do community service is more than a little ironic…

Michael Russell

Sorry friends, but the turning of Trinity Wall Street into the enemy deflects from the real scandal of Wall Street. This is a sideshow for people who have no other viable strategy or plan, a cheap and easy target. TWS would have been smart to oppose them being charged, but the OWS folks are flailing looking for some traction for an amorphous set of complaints.

Still no candidates running, no platform of any sort, no juice at all.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A
2020_011

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café