Support the Café

Search our Site

Bishop Stokes, a board member, reflects on events at GTS

Bishop Stokes, a board member, reflects on events at GTS

A statement on the crisis at The General Theological Seminary by Bishop Stokes of New Jersey and a Board Member:

October 20, 2014

Dear People of the Diocese of New Jersey:

…all have sinned, all fall short of the glory of God… (Romans 3:23)

As many of you are aware, there has been a major crisis at The General Theological Seminary in New York on whose Board of Trustees I serve. This situation has been sinful, grievous and ugly in every way, harming the body of Christ within and beyond the walls of the seminary. In a very considered letter dated yesterday, October 19, 2014, and addressed to his diocese, my colleague in Christ, and fellow member of the Board of Trustees, The Right Reverend Andrew Dietsche, Bishop of New York, called for the “full reinstatement” of the eight members of the seminary faculty who had walked out on September 26.

In his letter, Bishop Dietsche rightly characterized the dynamic conversation and rigorous debate that took place during the course of the regular meeting of the Board this past Friday, October 17. This conversation and debate resulted in three resolutions which did not, and could not, represent the fullness of the conversation or capture the clear concerns about a variety of questions that were evident in the room when they were passed. Despite the unanimity of the votes, we were not all of one mind.

While I have been, and am, committed to reconciliation and reinstatement of the eight faculty members, I have, with some reluctance, supported the decisions of the Board, including the resolutions passed on Friday, even as I had concerns and reservations about them.

My support of a resolution that called for the eight faculty to be “provisionally” reinstated, as the resolution was worded, was based on my conviction that they ought to be returned to their positions, but also my deep concern that they have not, as far as I am aware, rescinded the ultimatums contained in their letters of September 17 and September 24 which were publicly issued, nor have they acknowledged their share and culpability in this matter which have played a major contributing role in this crisis. I continue to have this concern.

Similarly, the Board, its Executive Committee and the Dean have not acknowledged clearly the major and contributing responsibility and culpability we each share in this matter. There is, in short, a genuine need for public confession and repentance from all the major parties: Board and its Executive Committee, Dean, and Faculty.

Having stated this, I am grateful for Bishop Dietsche’s courage and leadership and for his attempt to create a clearer path toward reconciliation. I am willing to support his call for the faculty to be immediately and fully reinstated with the understanding that there continues to be a need for public confession, healing and reconciliation from all parties.

In addition to supporting his call for the reinstatement of the eight faculty members, I call for the Executive Committee of the Board to take immediate steps to contract with a mediator outside of the Episcopal Church, skilled in Christian healing to begin a process of dialogue, confession, reconciliation and healing for the entire General Theological Seminary community as quickly as this can be arranged. I commit myself to participating in such a process in humility, charity and love.

The Diocese of New Jersey has five students currently enrolled at General. These students, and all the students at General, have been pawns caught up in terrible circumstances over which they have had little or no control. Their lives and vocations have been profoundly affected. I offer my deepest apologies to them for my role in this and commit myself to supporting them in their own healing and in whatever ways are necessary as they proceed through their processes of formation for ordination. I pray the wider church will do the same for seminarians from other dioceses.

I also offer my apologies and sorrow to my fellow alumni/ae of General who have been grievously hurt by the wounds inflicted on our alma mater as well as the body of Christ these past few weeks and for my own part in inflicting these wounds. The General Theological Seminary holds a dear place in my heart and that of my family. I have the highest regard for its dean, faculty and staff. I was taught by a couple of those who have been embroiled in this crisis and continue to treasure them and the role they have played in my life and ministry. This has been a sad affair and we have hurt one another. I apologize to them for the hurt I have helped to cause. The fragility of the seminary at this point in its history is widely known. This current crisis has further damaged us. It will require great efforts on all of our parts to recover from this injury. I commit myself to this work.

It is my hope and prayer that all of us who are involved in this crisis will cease the vicious attacks and vilification that have marked these weeks, abandon entrenched positions, separate ourselves from legalistic posturing and protection, acknowledge our wrongs and, by God’s grace, open ourselves to the deep love and healing light of our Savior Jesus Christ who has power to restore us to wholeness and make all things new. The words of our seminary hymn have been my prayer these past few weeks:

Let works of darkness disappear

before thy conqu’ring light;

let hatred and tormenting fear

pass with the passing night.

Amen, let it be so. Please know that I keep you, the clergy and laity of the Diocese of New Jersey, and all who are members of The General Theological Seminary Community in my heart and in my prayers.

Faithfully yours in Christ,

The Right Reverend William H. Stokes, D.D. (honoris causa)

Bishop of New Jersey


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Amen to Gregory Eaton and to William Hammond. Levi, with your zeal for the law you seem to overlook the fact that there are (or were?) written statutes and bylaws for the seminary, which the faculty and administration have agreed to and which are therefore contractually binding. Those laws protect the rights of faculty and students to protest what they regard as unjust and abusive treatment without suffering reprisal. Academic institutions do not and should not operate like for-profit organizations, all the more so when those academic institutions prepare people for ordained ministry. A faculty, moreover, is not instantly replaceable, certainly not one with the distinction and experience of the GTS faculty. There is no way in which the administration can go out into the highways and byways and pick up qualified faculty, besides which, no truly qualified teachers with any kind of self-respect would agree to teach under the intimidating conditions that now obtain. It seems, as of today, that a spirit of moderation is beginning to blow through the Close, for which thanks be to God. May her voice be heard by all.

(Rev. Dr. Linda M. Maloney

GTS (AS) 2001

William Hammond

Q. Who are these people?

A. They are the Faculty. They are not “the help”, and they are not pawns on a chessboard. They are the heart of the seminary. They were treated with disrespect by one who works for them (the collective ‘them’) as much as they work for him. And they, as a majority of the Faculty, do have the prerogative of notifying the Board that the Dean is not doing his job properly. In this case that notice was a bit over-stated, but it was not an ultimatum. An unwise Board can ignore them, but it cannot dismiss them without ransacking the Seminary.

Rev. Sylvia Vásquez, Walnut a Creek, CA

Thank you Bp. Stokes. This has been a tough situation for all TEC. I think your proposal for a professional mediator is a good step forward. I pray the board of trustees will go along with that.


The Board’s decision for a “conditional reinstatement” was extremely disappointing, and can only serve to exacerbate the conflict.

Before making any sort of decision, a thorough and *impartial* investigation by an outside party should have been conducted. This investigator should have met with the GTS faculty, the Dean, other interested parties, and been invited to submit a recommendation to the Board, as to what actions might be taken to move the seminary towards reconciliation and healing.

I have to say, as someone who does OD consulting, if the Dean had said half of what he has alleged to have said in a corporation, he would have been out on his ear.

It’s also disturbing that the Board would refer to the GTS 8 with, “Who are these people?” It reflects a lack of servant leadership and, IMO, a lack of understanding of the Gospel.

Sadly, this also confirms what a lot of un-churched people think of the church – that we are hierarchical and care more about power, prestige and making problems go away than we do about the mission of Christ. Or so my non-religious friends and acquaintances have informed me.

I hope that some mediation and conflict resolution can occur, but, at this point, it seems unlikely. Praying for the seminary, especially the students, and the church.

[“LSM” – Please sign your full true name to future comments.]

Jim Naughton

Kim, I just want to say that my reading of this letter could scarcely have been more different from yours. The bishop is, himself, offering numerous apologies and suggesting it might be a good idea if other people did the same.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café