Support the Café

Search our Site

As goes the middle class, so goes Christianity?

As goes the middle class, so goes Christianity?

Dave Albertson, writing in OnFaith, says that the from the time of St. Paul down to the present, the church is a bourgeois institution. He says the decline of the church is tied directly to the decline of the middle class.

The correlation is unmistakable. Reading Thomas Piketty’s much-discussed Capital in the Twenty-First Century is like reading a history of the incredible rise and decay of the institutional church. Piketty never mentions the church as he describes the bubble of egalitarian economics from 1930-1980. But chapter after chapter and chart after chart tell the same story that denominational leaders and sociologists of religion have been describing for decades: a steep incline in the 30’s and 40’s, a plateau through the mid-70’s, and a steady decline ever since.

Even more haunting is Charles Murray’s Coming Apart. Murray explains that for the past several decades, church participation within the middle class has hardly changed, but it has disappeared almost entirely within the working class. His observation is easily confirmed by attending worship services. The working class is poorly represented in our congregations; people in lower classes have little means to support a congregation with time, talent, or treasure, and they perceive little value in the institution.

Christians around the country are wondering why churches are in decline. The reason is not Darwin or Marx, science or atheism, culture wars, or competition. It’s economics. As goes the middle class, so goes the church.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marshall Scott

It seems to me that Albertson forgets that during the time of the boom the “working class” was also “middle class.” I have long thought that the norm in American history has been that economic participation in the United States required more than one income or earner (after all, when most of America was agricultural the work involved all family members physically able). I think that “middle class” has been defined ever higher in the past few year, or perhaps in the past few election cycles. So, I fear we are seeing a return to the historical norm. That would then suggest we look at patterns of attendance 100 years ago or so and compare those.

Rod Gillis

As goes the middle class, so goes middle class Christianity, but not Christianity as a whole.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café