Support the Café
Search our site

Archbishop of Canterbury on action against ISIS

Archbishop of Canterbury on action against ISIS

The Archbishop of Canterbury supports military action against ISIS and also asks to counteract the ideas that are behind these kinds of organizations.

Welby spoke to the General Synod about military action. ACNS:

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has backed the use of military intervention in the fight against Daesh (also known as ISIS, ISIL, or IS). His backing came during a debate at the Church of England’s General Synod this week on a motion about the refugee crisis.

He told Synod members that he welcomed the motion, but told them that if they passed it, with its call for the establishment of “safe and legal routes to places of safety . . . for refugees who are vulnerable and at severe risk”, the Synod would essentially commit itself “to supporting the use of armed force overseas.”

He said: “The reality of working in those areas to create routes to places of safety must include some kind of forceful response. It is almost impossible to see how it could be done otherwise. . .

“We must also recognise that in much of the Levant and the Middle East – and in many other parts of the world including north east Nigeria, including Burundi and other places – the forces that are driving people out into being refugees may need to be confronted.

In response to the Prime Minister, the Archbishop asks if the government is prepared to deal with the ideology behind the extremism.

“I thank the Leader of the House for the repetition of the statement, and particularly the publication of the Foreign Affairs Committee report, and particularly in both the statement and the report for the seriousness of their emphasis on a comprehensive approach – both of the seriousness of military action but also of the integration of soft and hard power; of the support for jobs, education, family and community life and stability, and of community flourishing in the neighbouring countries, which comes out very strongly and is very welcome.

“The test will obviously be the total mobilisation of effort in a focussed way that recognises the long-term needs of security for indigenous populations, and particularly the Christian populations, being harried out of the area at the time.

“For the first time in almost 300 years, we’re facing a conflict that has a distinct theological and religious element which we have not faced before. Recent studies demonstrate the theological basis of extremist groups behind jihadist thinking.

“Does the Government realise that in facing this conflict there must be an ideological response that is not only national in dealing with the threat of extremism here, but is global in challenging the doctrines that draw so many people to support ISIS internationally? And what steps are they proposing to take to put together the conflict at the ideological and theological level, as well as at humanitarian and military?”

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Simpson

“Senior western cleric supports state military action.” This could do more harm than good.

Jos. S. Laughon

It sounds like many here could use a refresher course in the Crusades (pretending they were capitalist, had nothing to do with Western Christianity or were largely genocidal ventures is utterly ahistorical or even contra-historical) and the 39 Articles when it comes to war and Christian doctrine.

JC Fisher

I’m well aware of the 39 Articles’ take on *many* things, that make me glad they’re relegated to the back of the 1979 BCP, as a historical (not binding) document.

Re the Crusades? Well, thrilled as I would be to take your course on them Mr Laughon, I believe I’ll keep my apprehension that, of ALL sides therein, the term “fustercluck” may hint at the truth.

Glenn Horton-Smith

I’m enough of an optimist to believe that establishing “safe and legal routes to places of safety . . . for refugees who are vulnerable and at severe risk” will make a difference for the good, immediately and ultimately. More good will come from saving people than we can imagine.

I’m enough of a realist to reluctantly agree with the Archbishop that some kind of military force will be needed to create such a route. With fear all around us, it’s easy to imagine that military force will be approved and employed primarily to protect ourselves and destroy the enemy, with consideration of vulnerable people who are not us as a secondary consideration at best. That would indeed be the same old story, same old cycle. But it’s possible to imagine protection of the vulnerable “not us” as the objective. I read the Archbishop’s statements as calling for “hard” and “soft” power to be directed that way. I pray that it may be so.

Rod Gillis

Not all Christians are on side with the Cof E’s senior civil servant on this one. See
http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/22358

It should be noted that PM David Cameron has been itching to get in on the bombing campaign for some time.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/27/david-cameron-syria-macho-foolish-labour-jeremy-corbyn

JC Fisher

I’m enough of a pacifist to know that military conquest of ISIS ultimately won’t make a difference.

But I’m also enough of a political realist to know that “ultimately not making a difference” doesn’t matter here. “You’ve spilled our blood, now we’ll spill yours” is the ONLY thing. Kyrie eleison…

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café