Support the Café

Search our Site

Anglican Covenant talk: Crew, MacCulloch return Williams’ serve

Anglican Covenant talk: Crew, MacCulloch return Williams’ serve

Yesterday we told you about Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and his video message to the Anglican Communion about why we need an Anglican Covenant. Today we find others with YouTube accounts and their own thoughtful responses.

Item 1: Professor Diarmaid MacCulloch says among other things that adopting the proposed Covenant just to keep in good relationship with the Archbishop of Canterbury is quite beside the point.

Item 2: Louie Crew, recalling Williams’ reassertion yesterday that the Covenant is not punitive, runs down the list of how punitive things have already become.

Your thoughts?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
E Sinkula

@Chris Epting

AMEN! My prayer is the remaining dioceses in England that have not voted play these videos and really reflect on the powerful words spoken.

Louie Crew gives terrific examples of how marginalized the US Church has been treated by other provinces. A covenant only gives more power to the powerful.


Chris Epting

May these two clips find their way into Lambeth Palace (and may Dr. Williams’ handlers actually allow him to see them). And may they be influencial as the Church of England continues to consider her response to the proposed Anglican Covenant.

John B. Chilton

@tobias ” It is profoundly non-covenantal, and plainly contractual; it is not a marriage, but a pre-nuptial agreement.”

Yes, and a under-the-gun post-pre-nuptial agreement at that.

tobias haller

Well done, sirs.

The real problem with the covenant is its general thrust towards scrutiny and discernment (the things the ABC thinks are needed!) in the interest of paring down difference, rather than towards tolerance, and even more, celebration of difference.

It is essentially inorganic — failing to recognize that it is the diversity of organs that make for the well being of the whole body. It is profoundly non-covenantal, and plainly contractual; it is not a marriage, but a pre-nuptial agreement.

Peter Pearson

Two very good presentations. Thank you.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café