Support the Café

Search our Site

“Anglican Communion Institute” on baptizing an infant of two dads

“Anglican Communion Institute” on baptizing an infant of two dads


In an unsigned post at the Anglican Communion Institute blog, the authors conclude an infant of two dads cannot be baptized until The Episcopal Church changes its teaching on marriage equality — or the dads renounce their marriage.

Under the Anglican concept of “lex orandi, lex credendi” (the rule of prayer is the rule of faith) the public worship of the church is the teaching of the church. When a same sex couple (or an unmarried couple) present their child for baptism they are required to answer publicly the following question:

“Do you renounce all sinful desires that draw you from the love of God?

I renounce them.”

This question and answer, as well as others in the baptismal covenant, unavoidably present the question of what the church’s teaching on sex outside traditional marriage really is. If the same sex or unmarried couple answers this question affirmatively, they and the officiant are publicly proclaiming that the teaching of the church does not consider their relationship sinful. Under the lex orandi standard, that is the teaching of the church.

What is the teaching of The Episcopal Church on this issue? If it is the same as that of the church throughout the centuries and of the overwhelming majority of Christians today, these parents in irregular relationships cannot give the appropriate assurance and the infant should not be baptized; or the promises on behalf of the child must be made solely by the godparents who do accept the teaching and the responsibilities associated with it; or finally, the rite must be changed to delete any reference to church teaching.

Contributors to the ACI are listed here, and include the retired bishop of Central Florida.


Budget numbers from the Diocese of Central Florida indicate substantial contributions to ACI.  In 2015 the Diocesan Tithe to National & World Mission includes $17,625 for the Anglican Communion Institute. In 2013 the diocese gave the Anglican Communion Institute $23,292 and DFMS (“815”) $57,572.

Added at 1:15PM Eastern Time, 5/8/2015:

Episcopal bishops charged with misconduct in oddly-timed complaint | Episcopal Diocese of Central Florida

July 7, 2012

Many Episcopal leaders are questioning the timing and substance of charges against seven bishops, including the Rt. Rev. John W. Howe [Bishop of Central Florida, retired], that they engaged in misconduct for having endorsed a friend of the court brief prepared by the Anglican Communion Institute in a Texas Supreme Court case between The Episcopal Church and the Diocese of Fort Worth over legal authority and ownership of church property in that diocese, according to a news article on by the Rev. George Conger.

“It is both disheartening and baffling that a few days before the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, the Rt. Rev. Clayton Matthews acting in his capacity as Intake Officer, informed seven bishops of the Episcopal Church that a complaint has been filed against them regarding their endorsing a friend of the court brief in litigation involving The Texas Supreme Court, The Episcopal Church, and the Episcopal  Diocese of Texas,” the Rt. Rev. Gregory O. Brewer, Bishop of the Diocese of Central Florida, said in a prepared statement July 2. “At issue is not a matter of doctrine but a disputed matter of law on which people in the Episcopal Church clearly disagree.  Why does signing such a brief warrant a complaint that Bishop Matthews takes seriously enough to send such a letter?  Is this an attack against free speech?  Are we not free to state our opinions in a court of law without retaliation by our church?  Is this  an intentional act of intimidation?  Or given how close this is to General Convention, is this a diversionary tactic to throw the spotlight away from weightier matters facing our Convention?  Until the content of the complaint comes to light we do not know.  However, I want to assure these bishops of my prayers; and I join with the Standing Committee of the Diocese of Central Florida in offering our support, prayers and friendship.”

In an amicus brief filed on 23 April 2012 the seven bishops and three scholars from the ACI – the Rev. Christopher R. Seitz, the Very Rev. Philip W. Turner, and the Very Rev. Ephraim Radner — argued a Tarrant County, Texas trial court misconstrued the church’s constitutions and canons by holding that the Episcopal Church was a hierarchical body with ultimate power vested in the General Convention.

Posted by John B. Chilton



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave Thomas

I have most always found myself in disagreement with the logic of the “institute”, but this time they have outdone themselves. This one article will do more to destroy their influence than anything they have ever printed.

Roger Mortimer

Canon J. Gary L’Hommedieu’s dramatic sermon of yesterday in the Central Florida cathedral may be of interest to some. Canon L’Hommedieu blames the whole mess on “social media activists on the West Coast” and on the Devil, whose tools these individuals are. Starts 4:35 minutes into the sermon.

David Streever

He certainly blamed it on people on the West Coast, but after listening to the entire screed, I wasn’t certain how or why he saw fit to blame them.

Did people on the West Coast arrange a date for a baptism and then back down at the last minute after some members of their congregation misunderstood how baptism works in TEC? I don’t think so, so it was a bit strange to hear him say it was their fault.

Cynthia Katsarelis

Here’s another interesting piece of work from a member of the ACI. Infant Baptism For A Modern Age by The Rev. Dr. Ephraim Radner

Apparently, we just don’t “understand” baptism. And it’s “unfortunate” that we non-understanders suggested that it was inappropriate to let Jack’s family be subjected to different scrutiny than other children… But it gets worse. Gay people are stealing babies from their rightful birth parents, apparently.

Better read it for yourself.
“In any case, the rapid civil embrace of same-sex coupled parenting, made possible through the civilly upheld techniques of surrogacy — so that children are no longer assumed to have the right to being raised by their mother and father in the first instance — is deeply problematic, and should be resisted by the church. This is not because gay adults cannot provide children with nurturing love. It would be absurd to suggest this. The problems lie elsewhere, including in the social realm of guaranteeing children their rights to their own birth family, and to a context where they themselves will learn to respect and further such rights for others.”

Kurt Hill

Ooops! It was Junior who delivered the eulogy at Grant’s Funeral.

Kurt Hill

Fortunately Bishop Hopkins (of Vermont) had some redeeming qualities. In the 1820s—years before the Oxford Movement and its Ritualism offshoot began— he was one of the first Episcopal priests to reintroduce the use of incense and ornate, colored vestments into Anglican worship. In addition to his disgusting pro-slavery tract, Hopkins authored several more positive works, including an “Essay on Gothic Architecture” (1836) and two volumes discussing liturgical ceremonialism, “The Primitive Church”(1835) and “The Law of Ritualism” (1866). He also delivered the eulogy at the Funeral of Ulysses S. Grant in 1885.

Kurt Hill
Brooklyn, NY

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café