Support the Café

Search our Site

Anglican Church of Canada responds to the realities of physician assisted dying

Anglican Church of Canada responds to the realities of physician assisted dying

The law in Canada changed last year to remove restrictions against physician assisted dying in certain circumstances. The Anglican Church of Canada has now produced a pastoral reflection and resource to assist those accompanying patients, parishioners, and their loved ones through such decisions.

From, In Sure and Certain Hope: Resources to Assist Pastoral and Theological Approaches to Physician Assisted Dying:

Our faith tradition holds that all life is sacred. This belief is the foundation of all healing ministries. Support for assisted dying seems antithetical to this belief. And yet, for those who seek assisted dying, exploring fully the questions and implications regarding assisted dying often requires a fundamental and deep examination of the meaning and purpose of life for both the one who is seeking assisted dying and the pastoral care provider. Seeking assisted dying is a reflection of the struggle for a quality of life upheld by a deep and abiding belief in the sacredness of life. …

Ultimately, it is not the pastoral care givers belief, nor the traditions or dogma of any faith tradition, nor the hopes and desires of family and friends which will determine the choice of assisted-dying. The final choice remains with the parishioner, informed by their own consciencious appropriation of their faith tradition. Family and friends provide the primary community within which the conversations that shape decisions happen. The pastoral care giver’s role becomes that of spiritual guide or facilitator. It is the pastoral care-giver who reminds and draws everyone’s attention back to the reality that God is present and amongst them sustaining this difficult journey of discernment and choice within God’s embrace of love and grace.

The ACNS quotes Canon Eric Beresford, chair of the task force that produced the report.

Beresford says some people see the new paper as an argument in favour of physician-assisted dying. These people, he says, have “completely misread” the report.

“At this point, physician-assisted dying is a part of our society,” he says. “Now, some churches are going to continue to argue this is a bad, bad thing, and we must stop it. That’s a decision that some churches have made. I suppose our problem with that is . . . what do you do with those members of your congregation who say, ‘Yes, but we believe it’s the right thing for us’? Are you really going to abandon them by simply saying, ‘Well, you know, tough luck – it’s not something you should be deciding,’” he says.

“I don’t think that’s the Anglican way.”

A previous ACC report in 1998 concluded cautiously that it did not support physician assisted dying. “Roughly twenty years later,” the new report continues,

we find ourselves in a changed situation, legally speaking. There have also been significant changes in medical technologies and therapies over these years. Changes in public opinion have followed. …

With the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in February of 2015 finding that physician assisted dying is constitutionally permissible for a small class of persons, the public debate concerning the legal ban on physician assisted dying is in some ways over. Physician assisted dying will now be an option for competent persons with grievous and irremediable illness who are experiencing intolerable suffering. The societal and legal context within which the pastoral and prophetic ministry of the church takes place has shifted. While many may regret this change, the task force believes that our energy is best spent at this time ensuring that this practice is governed in ways that reflect insofar as possible a just expression of care for the dignity of every human being, whatever their circumstances.

Read more on the church’s response to physician assisted dying here, and access In Sure and Certain Hope here.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rev. Bill Christy

As in the gay issue, the controversial subject of “assisted dying,” or as viewed by conservative’s’, “assisted suicide,” is, and will continue to be, a matter for Biblical study and prayer by both liberals and conservatives. This is a spiritual matter not to be taken lightly. Pray for our spiritual leaders that God may guide them with signs and wonders.

Lexiann Grant

I’m “conservative” and do not, never have, labeled this “assisted suicide,” so please don’t judge and label me. If we can compassionately & humanely grant the animals, also created by G-d and of whom we are stewards, merciful release from a painful death, I think we need to likewise consider the option to do the same for ourselves, we human animals. That is not assisted suicide, but also euthanasia.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café