Support the Café
Search our site

Alone

Alone

by Linda Ryan

Every man must do two things alone; he must do his own believing and his own dying. — Martin Luther

According to the US Census Bureau there are an estimated 7,071,341,675 people on this planet at this minute. Oops. Another minute is gone and the total has changed to 7,071,341,912. That’s an awful lot of people. There are some places where there are population densities of hundreds of thousands of people per square mile and others where human beings only travel through because the land is unsuited to human habitation without massive restructuring, but how do you restructure a sand dune a hundred feet high to provide a living space? It’s beyond my pay grade to try to figure out how it could be done, and I’m definitely sure I wouldn’t want to live there.

The world is much smaller than the world in which my parents and grandparents lived. Undoubtedly the thing that has most contributed to this shrinking world is the development of instantaneous communications, via radio, television, cell phones and the internet. For my grandparents, letters and newspapers and the occasional person passing through town brought news that was already history before they even heard of it. There were probably times when they felt lonely and cut off from the rest of the world, but that was just the way it was.

These days people seem to have lost the concept that being alone doesn’t always mean being lonely. Social networks on the internet and text messaging on cell phones mean that, barring being in a place with no bars on the phone or no wi-fi for the laptop, someone in a strange city can still be connected to friends and family. They may be a bit lonely, but they don’t always feel totally alone.

Despite the rise of instant connection and, in a sense, the end of virtual (if not actual) aloneness, people are still lonely. Oh, there are some who are perfectly comfortable being alone and don’t feel more than the occasional hint of loneliness but they are few and, unfortunately, far between. Most others have succumbed to the norm that one must (almost) never be alone because alone is bad, social and constant connection are good. There are, however, times when one is, despite all intentions to the contrary, alone, even in the middle of a crowd. Whether it is because they feel they are invisible to others, bear visible scars or disfigurements, are dirty or unkempt because they are homeless for whatever reason, or whether there is pain that focuses all one’s attention on it, there can be people all around and yet one can feel totally alone. Then there are those who are seemingly in perfect health, well cared-for and prosperous who feel like an empty shell, realizing there is a void there where something like faith should be. As Brother Martin said, a person must do their own believing, and in the aloneness of their existence at some point they must come to it on their own.

I confess that when I read Brother Martin’s statement my mind went to times when I’ve felt alone. One is when lying in an emergency room bed some years ago, suffering intense pain and waiting for someone to tell me what was wrong and that it could be fixed. Minutes seemed very long but I was aware of the bustle outside the curtains of my cubicle as well as the retching of the person in the next cubicle. I remember a television program about a day in the life of a hospital emergency room where a woman was brought in following a terrible accident of some sort. She was bruised and bloody, and she was surrounded by people talking, poking, prodding, inserting tubes and IV needles. All the people were talking and giving orders but to the woman, her seeming isolation led her to cry out, “Will someone please talk to me?” I’ve felt that way, even though I haven’t been in that same situation.

I have a feeling that’s what Jesus endured on the cross. He had people all around, looking at him, some gawking and some mourning the horrifying sight, and he also had the isolation of overwhelming physical pain. His cry of “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” was a reaction very similar to the woman’s “Will someone please talk to me?” only directed to the One with whom Jesus had always been in contact, even when he was physically apart from others. This time, though, Jesus was dying in a public place with people all around, yet he was dying totally alone. Alone in the midst of a crowd.

Even to those called to a state of that apartness we call “alone” or “solitary,” there is usually some connection with other human beings as well as with God. They say no Christian can be truly a Christian unless they are in community but I wonder, would the desert fathers and mothers have said the same? They may have lacked human community, but they sought, and frequently found, a greater one.

The world has changed a lot since Brother Martin spoke those words, yet they are as true now as they were then, maybe even more so. There are some things a person just has to do alone.

Linda Ryan co-mentors 2 EfM Online groups and keeps the blog Jericho’s Daughter

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Linda Ryan

Donald,

Thank you for your responses. I confess that the Desert Fathers (and Mothers) came to mind in the context of "alone" as I had just seen a program on TV where a man had deliberately chosen to live as a hermit for a month outside a monastery in the desert. He had a mentor who lived close by but who himself was a hermit who had chosen that life after some years of living in community in the monastery itself.

While I don't really think much of this current climate of individualism that is running rampant today, I see the value of individual time and apart-ness, being alone, if you will, as I formulate, contemplate and solidify my beliefs. Many of those which I was taught as a child have been discarded as unworkable or even bad theology to the adult me. I had help from teachers and communities in making those transitions, but ultimately I made them for myself, not for anyone else or to fit in to somewhere else or to someone else's belief system, even one I cherish as much as I do those of the Episcopal church with its broad umbrella.

I stand by Brother Martin (whether he said it or not), I can do no other.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Linda Ryan

Fr. John-Julian,

Thank you for your comments. I found the quotation online and, as so often happens, it stuck and made me stop and think for a while. That's what the reflection is about, my thinking, not whether or not Brother Martin ever really said it (and in what context) or whether or not it was orthodox thinking. It simply struck a chord and I followed it.

My point is that ultimately, even when surrounded by clouds of witnesses, the communion of saints, the heavenly host or just simply the nearest and dearest, when I die, I will die alone. I myself will die; those around me will not (at least at that time). Alone has two meanings for me, both of which I chose to use in the piece, namely "alone" as in "individual, single, solitary" and "alone" as in "personal responsibility." I will die alone but my beliefs are those which I myself have come to through reading, study, examples of others, prayer, and experience. I believe what I believe and I am responsible for those beliefs. I recognize that others' mileage may vary, but those were the conclusions that came to me as I contemplated the words, Brother Martin's or not.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Donald Schell

John-Julian,

In response to what you wrote to Linda, "The quotation (supposedly—but without any citation or evidence—by Martin Luther) is entirely false for any catholic Christian,"

I just spent twenty minutes in Google search and found many sources attributing the quotation to Luther and none with citation. I also noticed (as perhaps you have noticed before) that the internet offers a wealth of quotations without citation. I remain curious about citation but also think this one has the plausible sound of Luther's voice and rhetoric.

To your second point, on the one hand, I hear you joining your voice with our PB warning us against the contemporary heresy of individualism and individual salvation. On the other hand, hearing the quotation as very plausibly Luther's words, I hear his rhetoric flourish standing for the power of personal faith and individual conscience, a renaissance voice for the freedom of the Spirit protesting the hierarchical and unduly collectivist version of faith he saw in the world of the early 16th century.

In the 21st century, the way I hear Linda's question (and her good use of the Luther quotation) challenges the individualist, aggregate sense of self and personal agency that's part of our inherited individualist loneliness. Constant connection without communication or communion becomes, may be a cultural obstacle to faith and a means of denying our mortality. Touching the aloneness the desert fathers and mothers sought in the wilderness and observing the existential loneliness we face "walking that lonesome valley" Jesus walked, that "nobody else could walk for him" is also where we become genuinely open to the grace of community.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
John-Julian,OJN

The quotation (supposedly—but without any citation or evidence—by Martin Luther) is entirely false for any catholic Christian.

The reversion to the original first-person PLURAL in the Nicene Creed in the BCP is evidence—we do NOT "believe alone". We believe as a community—as the Body of Christ. The Faith is not private, and when we start believing "alone" is when we move into heresy and/or schism.

And certainly the same is true about dying. A Christian dies on earth as an integral part of the Body of Christ—leaving the earthly community and entering the perfect Community of the Divine—but never "alone".

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café