Support the Café

Search our Site

ACNA supporter asks why ACNA is silent in the gun debate

ACNA supporter asks why ACNA is silent in the gun debate

Chris Sugden, a member of the Church of England and an ally of ACNA wonders why ACNA is silent on gun control. He asked, and got some answers:

I have written to and spoken with four prominent and leading conservative Anglicans from the Anglican Church of America in the days following the Florida shooting. I asked, bewildered, why when secular columnists and others were calling for at least a ban on the sale of the bolt-ons that give rapid fire, the voice of the church in this debate was silent. I asked if they would speak out. The following reasons were given:

  1. “The Church is divided on the matter.” Yes, my good and dear friend, but the church has been divided on many things and still is. But yet churches and their leaders speak out on church dividing matters as same-sex relations and nuclear arms as they have in the past on issues such as apartheid over which the church was divided in South Africa.
  2. “The culture of the United States is particular on the matter: outsiders do not understand the culture.”  How often did we hear this response from South African Christians in the 1970s and 1980s when some of us as students closed bank accounts with Barclays and boycotted South African fruit over apartheid? Twenty years later apartheid was consigned to the rubbish heap of history.
  3. “It is a symptom of a deeper problem- the breakdown of the family in United States society. All the perpetrators were fatherless.” This avoids dealing with the issue in front of us by claiming to deal with a deeper seated issue which will take decades to repair.
  4. “Bearing arms in self-defence is part of our constitution”. Yes, and that applied in the age of the single shot musket, not in the age of the multi-repeater firearm.

So it is no wonder that with the Church silent, God is now using a different mouthpiece to address the situation – children.

Emphasis added.

For context, Sugden considers himself a voice for “orthodox Christians” as against the liberal elite of The Episcopal Church. He has access to the conservative leaders of ACNA. But gun control he finds himself at odds with ACNA.

Read it all, or here.

Image: #MarchForOurLives Seattle


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Perhaps it is because religious conservatism is as much about political conservatism as about religion. More likely still, perhaps it is more about cultural conservatism than it is about religion. Either way Jesus takes a backseat to conservatism.

Ann Fontaine

English evangelical vs. US

Ann Fontaine

English evangelicals tend to be more in line with Jesus teachings. Peace makers, feed the hungry, welcome the strangers,etc


Ann, say more about this point?

Kenneth Knapp

I think you could substitute the word “progressivism” for “conservatism” and your statement would have the same truth value. The progressives and conservatives are both adept at spotting the specks in each other’s eyes.

Tom Downs

Clever, but a false equivalency. The article is about the leadership of ACNA and their response; they are decidedly conservative religiously, and because of their silence, we can assume conservative politically. The author, a religious conservative himself, wants to call them on it. The implication is that they put politics ahead of their faith.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café