Support the Café

Search our Site

Accepting Evangelicals begins series on ‘Good Disagreement’

Accepting Evangelicals begins series on ‘Good Disagreement’

As the Church of England grapples with its division over the issue of the role of LGBTQ persons in the life of the church, the phrase ‘Good Disagreement’ has emerged as a shorthand way of describing means of living together as a church while holding sharply divergent views.

Accepting Evangelicals is a group of evangelically minded Anglicans who “believe the time has come to move towards the acceptance of faithful, loving same-sex partnerships at every level of church life, and the development of a positive Christian ethic for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.”  So, on their website they are initiating a series of essays that seek to describe and define what exactly ‘Good Disagreement’ might look like.

David-IsonThe first is by the David Ison, the Dean of St Paul’s.  In it, he seeks to fairly assess the limits of ‘Good Disagreement’ in the light of the anti-LGBTQ group Reform’s call to boycott facilitated discussions in the church.  It’s well worth a read, and in this excerpt he pulls no punches in getting to the crux of the matter;

And in the light of Reform’s response, there are also questions to be asked about the whole enterprise of ‘Shared Conversations’. Reflection ‘in the light of scripture’ brings in two of the classical Anglican markers of theological authority, the Bible and Reason, to which should be added an awareness of and exploration of Tradition – which requires a serious engagement with history which is not necessarily present in the heat of the debate. Further, the idea that there can be ‘safe space’ and a ‘safe environment’ for people to be vulnerable about their sexuality could only be true where those with power relinquish it. How reasonable is it to expect gay ordained and lay people, in a Church which discriminates against and condemns the expression of their sexuality, in a wider British culture which only very recently has begun to be more open about sexuality and where homophobic bullying and even murder are still current, let alone a world-wide culture in which homosexuality is in many places punished by imprisonment or death, should make themselves vulnerable to those who may want to exclude them? Will heterosexuals begin the discussion by sharing their struggles and experiences with their own sexuality, including those of their sins and shortcomings which might open them to the charge of hypocrisy, the loss of their reputation and authority, and possible disciplinary action? After all, far more damage is done in and to the Church by misbehaving heterosexuals than by gay people.


posted by Jon White



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Emily Windsor

In the Catholic Church there are Holy Orders that hold to and display their Doctrine in unaccustomed, unpopular traditions: chastity, poverty and secrecy. And so it must be, that the Church of England should adopt the practice of Holy Orders to give place to doctrines out of political and social favour to the Members of this Church not in accord with current practice.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café