Support the Café

Search our Site

A slow, painful process leading to death?

A slow, painful process leading to death?

Andrew Brown wonders if the Church of England can avoid destroying itself over women bishops and marriage equality.

The Guardian: Andrew Brown’s blog:

The female bishops fiasco is the latest expression of the long-running problems that have led to this situation. The Church of England as a whole wants female bishops by an overwhelming margin. Once it is allowed that women can be priests, and thus can represent Jesus at all, the idea that they can’t be promoted within the organisation becomes absurd and repugnant. Nonetheless, opposing female bishops is an article of faith among Conservative evangelicals, who believe that the Bible has patriarchy as a core value.

Although they are a very small minority among Anglicans and still smaller nationally, they are rich, well organised and passionate. At the last synod elections, in 2010, they managed to capture a blocking third of the members of the synod’s house of laity, which is elected by an arcane procedure from among churchgoers with the highest tolerance of committee meetings about nothing very much – deanery synod members, to be technical.

This meant that when proposals to make female bishops came before the synod for the last time last autumn – and this after five years of a legislative process apparently modelled on a cow’s digestive system, with four separate stages, much chewing on regurgitated matter, and a remarkable emission of noxious gas throughout – it still needed two-thirds majorities among all three constituent “houses” of the synod. The bishops and clergy voted it through overwhelmingly, but in the house of laity it failed to reach the necessary two-thirds majority by six votes.

The backlash was immediate and overwhelming. The outside world, and even the church outside the synod, simply could not understand how this had happened. The incoming archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has produced a much simpler measure to replace it, which would only take two years – incredibly fast by synodical standards – to become law. This strips off all the legislative frills and furbelows of the old measure, which were meant to protect the delicate sensibilities of opponents from the sight of women in episcopal frocks. Instead, they must hope that female bishops choose not to inflict their presence on congregations that loathe them. Although this will almost certainly happen, the fact that conservatives will no longer have a legal right to pretend that nothing has changed seems to them an appalling persecution. Any resemblance to their attitude to gay rights is entirely intentional.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leslie Scoopmire

Andrew Brown has a witty way of expressing what seems more and more to be a sad truth.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café