2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

A good faith effort from the Diocese of Lexington

A good faith effort from the Diocese of Lexington

The Diocese of Lexington is the latest to weigh in on how the Episcopal Church should attempt to restructure itself.

Whereas the mission of the Episcopal Church is to seek and serve Christ in all persons and

Whereas, this Church’s faithful engagement in Christ’s mission is to proclaim good news to the poor, release to the captives, recovery of sight to the blind, freedom to the oppressed and the acceptable years of the Lord in a way that maximizes the resources available for that mission at all levels of the Church, and

Whereas, the administrative and governance structures of The Episcopal Church have grown over the years so that they now comprise approximately 47% of the church-wide budget resulting in a situation that hinders rather than furthers this Church’s engagement in God’s mission,

Be it resolved that this 116th Convention of the Diocese of Lexington directs that the following resolution be filed with the Secretary of the General Convention for consideration by the 77th General Convention of The Episcopal Church:

Resolved that a Special Commission on Mission Structure and Strategy be created, the composition of which shall include the chairs of the Standing Committee for Structure of the Church, two persons appointed by the Presiding Bishop, two persons appointed by the President of the House of Deputies, and one lay and one clergy person appointed by each province of The Episcopal Church, keeping in mind that the representation of this Special Commission express the diversity of persons that make up the Episcopal Church, and be it further

Resolved that this Special Commission be formed within 60 days following the adjournment of this 77th General Convention, and be it further

Resolved that the several dioceses hold conversations concerning the re-structuring of the Episcopal Church with the goal of better aligning missional organization and enhancing ministry at all levels of The Episcopal Church, and report the findings of these conversations to the Special Commission by no later than the end of calendar year 2013, and be it further

Resolved that the Special Commission recommend a plan for restructuring the administration and governance of The Episcopal Church to be considered at the 78th General Convention, and be it further

Resolved, that the Joint Standing Committee on Program, Budget and Finance consider adding appropriate monies to the General Convention Budget to cover the cost of this mandate.

I don’t know whether 47 percent of the budget passed by General Convention is devoted to administration and governance, but setting that aside, I think this resolution moves the process in a helpful direction both in what it does include and in what it doesn’t. Directing dioceses to initiate conversations about church reform can only be helpful, providing information we don’t currently have. Dropping the requirement that we hold a special convention will save money, reduce the drama a special convention would have ginned up, and allow the people of the church to elect representatives to the 2015 convention who represent their views on issues surrounding restructuring, if they so choose.

I don’t have a firm opinion on the manner in which this special committee would be put together, mostly because I don’t know how decisions are made on the provincial level. I like the idea of representing the broad diversity of the church, as the legislation says, but I am not entirely sure that provinces, appointing to represent their own interests, are going to give us any kind of diversity other than the geographic. I am also not clear on why the Standing Committee on Structure can’t do this job itself.

That said, this resolution feels like a good faith effort to respond to some of the criticisms of previous legislation.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dylan

I think it’s funny, ironic, and a little sad that there are all of these resolutions being passed to create a new structure with the same charge as the Standing Commission on the Structure of the Church — and to do so in the name of: a) reducing the volume of legislation at GC; and b) streamlining and reducing the number of CCABs.

I think the Sauls Proposal doesn’t do what Bishop Sauls says he wants it to do, namely, spark a creative conversation; what it does is create a redundant structure and hint at creating more (e.g., why do we need a Board of Trustees in addition to an Executive Council when Executive Council already has this function covered?).

Sarah Dylan Breuer

James Mackay

This resolution seems to fit St Paul’s ‘everything done decently and in order’ maxim. It also will coincide with the election of the next presiding bishop. While much has been made of money and the structures that spend it, not much has been pondered concerning the leadership of The Episcopal Church, as a whole or the dioceses. Just as one might see an internist to receive an accurate diagnosis, the patient would be referred to a specialist for surgery, and even to another person trained in rehabilitation. Those that are able to identify problems of administration and structure may not be the strongest choice for implementing change.

I’m not sure that the Sauls proposal considers the leadership question. The Lexington Diocese proposal seems to have more room for that conversation to take place.

James Mackay

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café