Support the Café

Search our Site

A brighter future for religious progressives?

A brighter future for religious progressives?

If Robby Jones of the Public Religion Research Institute is right, progressive people of faith have reason to be optimistic.

[A] new religious orientation scale developed by PRRI and Brookings finds that a significant number of Americans—approximately 1-in-5 (19 percent)—are religious progressives. The findings also show the difference in size between religious progressives and conservatives is smaller than conventional wisdom might suggest: religious conservatives comprise 28 percent of the population, outweighing religious progressives by just nine points.

The new PRRI/Brookings survey also reveals both challenges and potential opportunities for religious progressives as compared to religious conservatives. The biggest challenge religious progressives face is the considerable racial and religious pluralism among their ranks. While more than seven-in-10 religious conservatives are white Christians (including a block of 43 percent who are white evangelical Protestants), religious progressives are strikingly diverse and no religious group makes up more than 20 percent of the whole. Only about four-in-10 are white Christians (including only four percent who are white evangelical Protestants, 19 percent who are white mainline Protestants, and 18 percent who are white Catholics); 13 percent are non-Christian religious Americans such as Jews, Muslims, Buddhists or Hindus; and about one-in-10 are black Protestants (9 percent), other Christians (10 percent) who are mostly comprised of non-black ethnic minorities, or Hispanic Catholics (eight percent). Notably, nearly one-in-five (18 percent) religious progressives are “unattached believers,” those who are not formally affiliated with a religious tradition but who nevertheless say religion is at least somewhat important in their lives. Compared to religious conservatives, this internal diversity presents a formidable organizing handicap for religious progressives, who generally have a more fractured infrastructure, and also raises the bar for advocacy efforts that need to put forward a coherent message.

Despite these serious challenges, there are some signs that religious progressives may have stronger future growth potential than religious conservatives. For example, the average age of religious progressives is 44—just under the average age in the general population of 47—while the average age of religious conservatives is 53. And there is a nearly linear decline in the appeal of religious conservatism with age. Religious conservatives make up smaller proportions of each successive generation, from 47 percent of the Silent Generation (ages 66-88) to 34 percent of Baby Boomers (ages 49-67), 23 percent of Generation X (ages 34-48), and 17 percent of Millennials (ages 18-33). Millennials are nearly twice as likely as the Silent Generation to be religious progressives (23 percent vs. 12 percent). Among Millennials, religious progressives significantly outnumber religious conservatives; additionally, 22 percent of Millennials are nonreligious.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café