Support the Café

Search our Site

85 percent of Americans give away less than two precent of their income

85 percent of Americans give away less than two precent of their income

Vox carries an excellent excerpt from the new book “The Paradox of Generosity” by Christian Smith and Hilary Davidson. Using data collected with the Science of Generosity Survey, they determined that three precent of Americans give away at least 10 percent of their income and that 85 percent of give away less than two percent of their income.

In a paragraph in which social science meets the stewardship sermon, they write:

We find a strong and highly consistent association between generous practices and various measures of personal well-being like happiness, health, a sense of purpose in life, and personal growth. In our book we discuss the various causal mechanisms that produce this association. While greater well-being can encourage generosity, practices of generosity also enhance well-being. The causal mechanisms we identify involve everything from reinforcing positive emotions to developing a sense of self-efficacy to expanding social networks to increasing physical activity. Generosity, for example, often triggers neurochemical systems that increase pleasure and reduce stress. It also has the capability of reducing the maladaptive self-absorption that many ungenerous Americans experience. By giving away some of our resources for the well-being of others we can enhance our own. By clinging to what we have, we shortchange ourselves.

Smith and Davidson list a number of reasons that Americans give away so little of their income including our failure to believe that generosity is essential, our sense that we do not have enough money and our belief that the poor should help themselves.

As Elaine Woods of California put it plainly: “Do I feel an obligation to do things that are not going to harm other people? Yes, I do. Do I feel an obligation to care for other people? No.” To state it differently, the ungenerous Americans we talked with fail to grasp the fact that their actions do not take place in a social, political, economic, and environmental vacuum. They do not see that everyone’s life, however lived, sends out ripples of influence, positive and negative, toward untold numbers of other people. We cannot help but be responsible to some extent to and for others. But the notion that it is possible to give more generously of one’s resources to others rarely, if ever, crosses the minds of the ungenerous.

In the end, however, the fear of not having enough, coupled with an autonomously individualistic lifestyle, nearly always proves to be deeply unfulfilling. Attaining the sort of happiness found in material well-being and security, which the majority of ungenerous Americans pursue without regard for others, comes at a great personal cost. The battle is won, but the war is lost. The means people use to achieve this version of happiness leads to a self-defeated end. And that frustrated end obscures the deeper, richer, more complex kinds of happiness humans want, sending them on misguided searches for more of what already does not satisfy.

What do you think about the authors’ research and their reasoning? Why do you think most Americans give away so little of their income? What principles guide your giving?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carol Cole Flanagan

The authors’ research and reasoning is consistent with my experence. We give 10-15% a year. The bulk of it goes to the church but we also support a variety of Episcopal organizations and schools in addition to causes beyond the church. The benefit to us is enormous, and the practice of generosity is essential to our spiritual well-being. I think Americans are hghly anxious about money and think they will never have enough. (I should confess that I serve on the Standing Commission on Stewardship and Development, but speak only for myself.)


Why do you think most Americans give away so little of their income?

At the nexus of “*I* need it more” and “THEY (the Them) deserve it less”. [Kyrie eleison, I’m guilty, too.]

JC Fisher


Oops I forgot to add my name.

Jonathan Galliher

[thanks– editor]


I give ~10% to the church although I figure it by rounding up the net income on my paycheck. There’s not really any principle behind it though, other than the general teaching that the tithe is the minimum standard of giving and that I don’t really own anything before God, not even myself. My giving beyond the tithe is based on whether or not I have any spare dollars when I’m asked, so definitely no principle there.

Jonathan Galliher

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café