Support the Café
Search our site

Diane Rehm talks about end of life care and the right to die

Diane Rehm talks about end of life care and the right to die

John Bartram Rhem had Parkinson’s disease and was ready to die. But his doctor could neither assist him in his death nor have the conversation about end of life care beyond attempts to manage the pain and offer physical support. In the end, he decided to refuse nutrition and hydration in any form and died ten days later.

His wife, NPR talk show host Diane Rehm talks about her experience caring for her husband during his final days and the need to open the conversation about end of life care, including the right to die, in a new book “On My Own.”

Religion and Ethics Newsweekly:

The Rehm’s attended the Episcopal Church, and John recounted his own spiritual journey in his own book “Onward Journey: Seeking the Divine.”

The Rehm family was not always religious. The couple’s two children were baptized in the Syrian Orthodox Church. (Diane’s parents emigrated from the Middle East.) But John was not religious for much of his life. The two met in 1958, when he was a lawyer at the State Department and she was a secretary.

John humored his wife and attended St. Patrick’s Episcopal Church in Washington, D.C., a church that appealed to the couple because of its involvement in the civil rights movement.

Years later, John had a conversion experience. He walked out of New York’s St. Thomas Church “a new man and Christ’s own,” as he described in his own memoir, “Onward Journey: Seeking the Divine.”

It was “as though for all of his adult life he had been fighting against the idea of belief in God, or Christ,” Diane said.

But John’s illness interrupted their participating in the parish.

The Episcopal Church is officially opposed to doctor-assisted dying (also called assisted suicide), passing resolutions in 1991, 1994, and 2000.

In 1996, The Diocese of Newark issued a report on Assisted Suicide, saying that it may be morally acceptable for terminally ill persons to end their own life. The report set out seven criteria:

  1. the decision to hasten death is a truly informed and voluntary choice free from coercion
  2. a person’s condition is terminal or incurable
  3. pain is persistent and progressive
  4. all other reasonable means of amelioration of pain and suffering have been exhausted
  5. the decision to end one’s life has been discussed with significant others
  6. the method and timing of death have been clearly discussed and understood by the patient
  7. the plan for voluntary assisted death places maximum autonomy and command of the process in the hands of the dying person

The Pew Forum, in a summary of various religious traditions teaching on the subject, summarizes the Episcopal Church’s stand in this way:

In 1991, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution against assisted suicide and other forms of active euthanasia, stating that it is “morally wrong and unacceptable to take a human life in order to relieve the suffering caused by incurable illness.” According to Timothy Sedgwick, a professor of Christian ethics at Virginia Theological Seminary, this teaching comes from the church’s broader view “that one should never take a life, even your own.” At the same time, Sedgwick says, there is a sense within the church that hard-and-fast rules on end-of-life issues may not fit every circumstance. “Although we have a clear moral norm against the taking of human life, there may be cases that stand beyond judgment,” he says.

The church also teaches that it is justified to stop medical treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, when that treatment brings significantly more burdens than benefits to a person. Such decisions also should be informed by the moral norm against taking life, Sedgwick says. “The dividing line here is the difference between the intent to take life and withdraw[ing] treatment.”

According to Ms. Rehm’s account, her husbands choice to withhold nutrition and hydration appears to be consistent with the 1991 General Convention resolution, but it may have been a decision of last resort. The press reports, interviews, and news releases do not indicate what role, if any, pastoral care played in his decision to withhold treatment.

Rehm said she decided to write the book because she was frustrated by the way her husband died.

“People need to talk about this issue,” she said. “Doctors need to be taught about this issue. The whole idea of doctors being taught about helping to keep people alive, but not being taught how to listen to those who are ready to die — that seems to me sad and misguided.”

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gary Paul Gilbert

She is an excellent spokesperson for choice. The churches are generally behind on most of the big issues of the day.

Gary Paul Gilbert

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
JC Fisher

Generally speaking, this seems like an area where the Church can speak to the Big Picture (life is sacred, human beings have a right to control pain), but should stay out of the particulars (e.g., blanket condemnations of assisted suicide). I trust individual priests in individual pastoral situations w/ dying persons (their families and doctors), to craft a case-by-case basis. There's no one-size-fits-all.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café