Uruguay cannot change provinces

The Anglican Consultative Council turned down a bid by the Diocese of Uruguay to switch from the province of the Southern Cone to the province of Brasil. The dioceses elected candidate for Bishop was turned down by the province and the diocese wants to ordain women to the priesthood, which the Southern Cone does not allow.

Brasil is the northern neighbor to Uruguay.

The Anglican Journal reports:

The diocese of Uruguay says it feels “abandoned and unsupported” after the standing committee of the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) turned down its request to change provinces.

The diocese, which is part of the province of the Southern Cone, has asked that it be transferred to the province of Brasil, which it says is “more compatible” in terms of theology, mission and philosophy.

It appealed to the ACC standing committee to review its decision, saying it feels “adrift, as if condemned to stay in a province where it doesn’t fit.”

In 2010, the diocese voted to seek another jurisdiction after a proposal to allow dioceses to individually permit the ordination of women to the priesthood was turned down by the 10th Southern Cone synod. The diocese of Uruguay, which currently has female deacons, has been requesting the ordination of women for more than a decade.

In a press statement, Uruguay’s diocesan permanent committee, said the standing committee’s suggestions for a way forward only focused on the election of a bishop co-adjutor, which it undertook last year. This election was not ratified by the province, however.

Archdeacon Michael Pollesel, former general secretary of the Anglican Church of Canada, was elected in that process. The province has rejected his election twice, a move that the Uruguay diocese described as “the last straw.”

The diocese said it would have no problem holding another episcopal election, but that the ministry and mission of the new bishop and the diocese would “still be constrained by the missiological, philosophical and theological differences” with the province. The standing committee appears to have overlooked these differences “and offers no way forward,” it said. The diocese has tried to “follow the rules and its request is still being ignored.”

Posted by
Category : The Lead

Comment Policy
Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted. We also ask that you limit your comments to no more than four comments per story per day.

  1. Paige Baker

    So let me get this straight….

    If you don’t want women priests or bishops, and/or you don’t approve of ordaining LGBT clergy (partnered or otherwise), you can request alternative episcopal oversight. But if you *want* to ordain women/LGBTs to the priesthood or the episcopate, and you request alternative episcopal oversight, you are just out of luck?

  2. tgflux

    Sounds about right, Paige.

    Kyrie eleison!

    JC Fisher

    Ye gods, WHY must Anglicans KEEP THWARTING THE GOSPEL?!?!

  3. Savi Hensman

    They are not even seeking alternative episcopal oversight, just realignment within a particular geographical region. Uruguay borders Brazil, so it would seem a fairly modest request. But perhaps the ACC is afraid that the Southern Cone would no longer be viable if dioceses which found it oppressive could be freed from it.

  4. billydinpvd

    Where could we read the standing committee’s report and how the voting unfolded?

Comments are closed.