Pelagius

Daily Reading for August 30

Pelagius, born in the latter half of the fourth century, was a Celtic Briton. Tradition has it that he was the son of a Welsh bard, which would help to explain his breadth of learning. He was a big, enthusiastic man; even his physical appearance became subject to adverse comment. Augustine’s friend Orosius describes him as a huge, proud Goliath, over-confident in his own strength, and even criticizes Pelagius’ hair-style, which may well have been an early example of the Celtic monastic style modeled on the pre-Christian Druidic tonsure (long but shaved around the sides and back), as opposed to the traditional Roman cut (shaved at the crown of the head). This same issue was to draw attention a few centuries later, at the Synod of Whitby, and of course was much more than a mere disagreement about hair-style. It signaled an unease about the Celtic mission’s readiness to incorporate aspects of the thought and symbolism of the nature mysticism and religious practice that preceded Christianity in Celtic Britain.

The early writings of Pelagius contain themes that would develop into some of the main characteristics of the Celtic tradition over the following centuries. Pelagius even makes reference, for example, to the practice of finding an anamchara or ‘soul friend’, a well-known feature of the spiritual discipline within the Celtic Church in later centuries. Typically, he focuses less on looking to the organized Church for spiritual counsel than on finding in life a ‘friend of the soul’, one to whom the inner self can be opened, ‘hiding nothing’, as Pelagius says, ‘revealing everything’ in order to know and further explore what is in one’s own heart.

From Listening for the Heartbeat of God: A Celtic Spirituality by J. Philip Newell (Paulist Press, 1997).

Comments (3)

Pelagius lost the battle with Augustine over grace and salvation, but it's worth remembering that it was a real battle, and Augustine may not have written the final words on the subject.

--Alan Justice

Isn’t Pelagius considered a heretic? Pelagius believed and taught that the human will was sufficient to live a sinless life. He told his followers that good deeds on the part of human beings was all that was necessary for salvation. To him, the grace of God was only an added advantage; helpful, but in no way essential. Pelagius did not believe in original sin, but said that Adam had condemned mankind through bad example, and that Christ’s good example showed humanity a path to salvation but only thru the work of man’s own will. According to Pelagian doctrine, since humanity is no longer in need of God's grace beyond the creation of human will, Jesus' sacrifice on the cross is devoid of any redemptive quality.

Didn’t Pelagius essentially deny the divine nature of Jesus Christ? I have read that Pelagius preferred and taught others to refer to Jesus as the “teacher” or “master” rather than any epithet implying divine power, disdaining to call Jesus the Messiah or Christ.

While some of his views and teaching are interesting, including his condemnation of what he saw as the moral laxness of the church in his time, I don’t think we should be endorsing the views of someone who is widely considered a heretic.

Daniel Robison

He is mainly accused of being a heretic of those who supported Augustine and Rome. Read Philip Newell for more on Pelagius.

Add your comments
Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertising Space