Broad, tolerant charity

Daily Reading for March 22 • James DeKoven, Priest, 1879

In the midst of the debates over ritualism, James DeKoven, a clerical member of the House of Deputies, vigorously espoused the Anglo-Catholic position. . . . Concerned about the evangelicals’ efforts to restrict the range of doctrinal and liturgical beliefs in the Episcopal Church, DeKoven delivered a memorable speech to his fellow deputies in 1871. He defended ritualism on three grounds. First, he noted that many Anglo-Catholic practices not only were used in the early church (the elevation of the bread and wine) but also were ancient and biblical in origin (the use of incense in worship). Second, he suggested that beliefs such as the real presence of Christ in the eucharistic elements strengthened the religious commitment of the Christian faithful. And third, he argued that a “broad, Catholic, tolerant charity” was needed to encourage the spread of Christianity throughout all segments of American society.

In the end, sharp disagreements over the meaning of liturgical rituals and texts—theological differences intensified by latent anti-Catholic prejudices—tore the institutional fabric of the Episcopal Church in a way that the moral issue of slavery had failed to do only a few years before.

From The Episcopalians by David Hein and Gardiner H. Shattuck, Jr. Copyright © 2004. Used by permission of Church Publishing Incorporated, New York, NY. www.churchpublishing.org

Comments (2)

What a powerful juxtaposition, slavery vs. ritualism. You can sure tell what motivated Episcopalians back then.

When in the late 19th century did General Convention take the vote to rename TEC the American Catholic Church? I recall it failed to pass by a single vote.

Interesting that the phrase "tore the institutional fabric" is used -- like the Windsor report. Ritualism did and inclusion of homosexuals has torn the fabric of TEC. Has there been healing on the ritualism front? And if so, does portend something for rift over homosexuality?

Since there never was a rift over slavery is its legacy still festering? The same could be asked of integration of the church. It had more to do with external forces than internal struggles. Does this church still have a race problem because of that?

Add your comments
Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertising Space