B16 says the best celibate is a straight celibate
Recently, the news was filled with the Pope's apparent change of mind regarding the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. But few reported that the Pope said in the same book of interviews that he believes that the priesthood should be closed to all homosexuals.
Apparently, the Pope is just like those Marines who are afraid that openly gay service members will feminize combat units. The Pope assumes that gay men can't be sufficiently paternal to be celibate.
According to the interview, what's important about celibacy is not just that the priest is refraining from sex, but that the hetero male priest, in refraining from making babies, emphasizes his paternal role to the congregation. (Speaking of paternity, former Roman Catholic and now Episcopal priest Alberto Cutié has become a dad, but I digress.)
Phil Lawler writes at Catholic Culture:
If you want to drum up controversy on the basis of one quote pulled out of the Pope's book-length interview Light of the World, how about this one, found on page 152:Homosexuality is incompatible with the priestly vocation.Unlike the now-famous quotation about condom use, this sentence isn't pulled out of context. The Pope isn't merely speculating. He isn't raising a possible objection or exception to his own argument. His point is clear.
Pope Benedict reminds his interviewer: "The Congregation for Education issued a decision a few years ago to the effect that homosexual candidates cannot become priests..."
Oh, sure; we all remember that decision. As soon as it came out, American seminary administrators rushed to "clarify," saying that the Vatican intended that rule to apply only to active homosexuals. The Pope thinks otherwise; he speaks of homosexual orientation, not homosexual activity. He explains that homosexuals cannot become priests "...because their sexual orientation estranges them from the proper sense of paternity, from the intrinsic nature of priestly being."
This isn't a trivial concern, the Pope adds:
The greatest attention is needed here in order to prevent the intrusion of this kind of ambiguity and to head off a situation where the celibacy of priests would practically end up being identified with the tendency to homosexuality.
So behind Benedict's view of celibacy there is a public relations problem. It seems that Benedict is afraid that the public will equate priesthood with homosexuality. So I guess the faithfulness of the priest is secondary. It is how macho he appears.

This reminds me of a comment made by a vestry member when a celibate gay man was entering the priesthood, "I'd rather have a fornicating heterosexual priest than a celibate gay priest." After the church had both I wanted to ask if the opinion was the same.
[Greta: Great to have your comment. Please include your full name next time you comment at the Cafe. - eds.]
Posted by Greta
|
December 3, 2010 12:18 PM
We may as well have the rest of what the pope said,
http://www.thetablet.co.uk/page/speeches
Homosexuality is incompatible with the priestly vocation. Otherwise, celibacy itself would lose its meaning as a renunciation. It would be extremely dangerous if celibacy became a sort of pretext for bringing people into the priesthood who don’t want to get married anyway. For, in the end, their attitude toward man and woman is somehow distorted, off centre, and, in any case, is not within the direction of creation of which we have spoken. The Congregation for Education issued a decision a few years ago to the effect that homosexual candidates cannot become priests because their sexual orientation estranges them from the proper sense of paternity, from the intrinsic nature of priestly being… The greatest attention is needed here in order to prevent the intrusion of this kind of ambiguity and to head off a situation where the celibacy of priests would practically end up being identified with the tendency to homosexuality.
Posted by John B. Chilton
|
December 3, 2010 12:30 PM
B16 says "For, in the end, their attitude toward man and woman is somehow distorted, off center, and, in any case, is not within the direction of creation of which we have spoken." Now let me get this straight ( as it were), priests must be heterosexual otherwise their attitude toward man and woman is distorted. So priests must have a natural sexual attraction to women that they are willing to suppress in order to uphold the proper attitude toward man and woman? Good grief, when did they stop teaching logic at the Gregorian?
Posted by Rod Gillis
|
December 3, 2010 1:03 PM
"Heterosexuals w/ a priestly vocation" (blah-blah-blah).
So they tell him. >;-/
While there's ALWAYS an element of asceticism in the call to the priesthood, and there's ALWAYS an element of asceticism in a call to celibacy...
...it seems to me that B16 is lifting up the ascetical element in a way, over everything else, that is positively fetishistic. I honestly believe this is NOT, when he said "Come, Follow Me", Jesus had in mind.
JC Fisher
Posted by tgflux
|
December 3, 2010 2:15 PM
John Chilton, thanks for the entire quote, which gave me my best laugh of the day. I'm not kidding. But the pope's statement is not funny at all, except in the absurdity of his ideas.
I ask whose "attitude toward man and woman is somehow distorted, off centre..."? The Vatican as the Bizarro World.
June Butler
Posted by GrandmèreMimi
|
December 3, 2010 3:08 PM
For an insider view see the interview in the Nov 22 issue of Der Spiegel with David Berger:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,730520,00.html
David Berger, 42, was Professor of the Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas. He resigned from all his offices after outing himself as a gay man in April of 2010. His book "Der heilige Schein. Als schwuler Theologe in der katholischen Kirche" (The Holy Illusion: A Gay Theologian in the Catholic Church), was recently published by Germany's Ullstein Verlag.
Posted by deirdregood
|
December 3, 2010 5:30 PM
There was research done in the late 1990's that indicated gay RC priests respected their professional sexual boundaries while their straight priest counterparts sexually exploited parishioners.
Don Hands
[Name added. Don, please remember to include your full name at the end of your posts. - ed.]
Posted by ministryman
|
December 4, 2010 10:57 AM
I've been fasting from posting on this blog but this one was just too much. This man does not speak for the God I have known from my youth any more than Pat Robertson does. (How'd you like to be on that list?) I wish we could just move on, knowing that we are doing what our hearts say is good and just and right, with God's blessing on our recklessness.
Posted by Peter Pearson
|
December 4, 2010 9:49 PM