Criticizing Conspicuous Clerical Consumption

Should clergy live according to their means, just like the rest of us? Or do they have a special responsibility to live more simply, and to give more away? David Briggs of Religion News Service reports:

As the new bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America for the Northeastern Ohio Synod, Eaton wants a house closer to her new office and to the church where her husband, the Rev. Conrad Selnick, serves as pastor.
...
And they want a home that makes the right impression for someone whose role is considered, in theological terms, as a servant of servants. Her lifestyle as the spiritual leader of a region that includes Cleveland, America's poorest big city, according to the Census Bureau, is part of the church's witness to the world, she said.

So Eaton doesn't expect to buy anything too lavish. She said her new house may not even be as big as her current four-bedroom, 2 1/2 -bath home, valued at $140,000.

"I hope we don't get into conspicuous consumption," she said.

For clergy, choosing a residence can be an inexact balancing act between biblical and theological emphases on a simple lifestyle on the one hand and personal and practical considerations on the other.

"It doesn't do anyone any good to live in a shack," Eaton noted.
...
Cleveland's Catholic bishop, Richard Lennon, lives with four priests in a downtown rectory.

Episcopal Bishop Mark Hollingsworth Jr. owns a suburban home on 2.4 acres that he bought for $1.66 million in 2004.

Lennon said he tries to follow church teachings that encourage clerics "to set aside every appearance of vanity in their possessions." Hollingsworth said he wants a place where he can entertain and host events for the diocese.
...
When Hollingsworth was elected an Episcopal bishop in 2003, he, his wife and four children were offered housing by the diocese. Hollingsworth chose instead to buy a $1.66 million home with seven bedrooms, seven full and two partial bathrooms and five fireplaces across from a park in Shaker Heights, Ohio. The bishop bought the house with what he would only describe as his "personal resources." No church money was used, the diocese said.

"The elements that went into deciding where to live were primarily personal and had to do with finding a home for our young family that had access to schools and proximity to my office and also a place where we could offer hospitality to the diocese," he said.


Read it all here.

Comments (4)

Many denominations are proud of seeing their leader in "posh" surroundings. Of course it seems somewhat in contradiction to ideas of stewardship of resources and our ideas of a "Biblical" lifestyle.

Our diocese spent and invested, in the past year or so, nearly $2.5 million on housing for two bishops.

My wife and I can just afford to rent a small two-bedroom apartment and scrape by with just enough to cover preschool for our one child. . . in a housing market where a two bedroom house can easily sell for $600,000 or more.

And I'm actually lucky because I have a full time job as the head of a reasonably wealthy church in the diocese. I have extraordinarily talented and gifted colleagues who are not so fortunate.

The Church seems just as susceptible to financial inequities amongst its "employees" as any secular business today.

We have a lot of work to do.

I didn't realize this was so important until I decided NOT to live in the rectory and to buy a home. People had many opinions about where I should live and in what kind of home. Coming from the East Coast to the Midwest meant we could get practically a mansion for less than our humble split level in Maryland. But we decided against the big stone Tudor things we could have afforded and found a little Cape Cod, with nothing curbside to show any ostentatious living. It does have decent public space downstairs though, for parish functions.

It's a dance. On the one hand, you should be able to exercise the same housing choices as anyone else. On the other hand, what do your choices say about you and about the gospel?

As a priest in Bishop Hollingsworth's diocese, I have no problem with his housing. He and his wife and family host diocesan events in their home. He and his wife both have the personal and family resources to afford the home they have purchased. Why is it anyone else's concern what sort of housing they choose to purchase? (It is, by the way, an interesting point that the pastor husband of the Lutheran bishop is, in fact, an Episcopal priest serving in Bishop Hollingsworth's diocese.)

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space