Gun control compromise fails in Senate

Today's Senate vote failed to earn the 60 required votes needed to pass, 54 in favor and 46 against.

The Huffington Post reports:

The measure -- painstakingly crafted by the bipartisan duo of Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) -- was seen as the key to passing the first legislation in decades to address the sorts of mass slaughters that so recently horrified the country in Newtown, Conn., where 20 children and six educators were gunned down at an elementary school, and in Auroro, Colo., where 12 people were killed in a theater.

The Washington Post's Aaron Blake on the President Obama's reaction:

“Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and their allies willfully lied about this bill,” Obama said. ”They claimed this bill would create a federal gun registry. … Unfortunately this pattern of untruths about this legislation served its purpose.”

Jonathan Bernstein says in the Washington Post that the push is not yet done:

It may sound trite to say it, but it really does come down to whether those who really care about it can sustain their effort over time, build support, and be ready with consensus legislation when the time comes. That wasn’t the case this time, as we found out this week. But as brutal as today was those who care about gun violence, the overall process can still be a step forward — if people keep working at it.

Twitter is ablaze with reaction:

Former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords ‏tweeted @GabbyGiffords:

Senate ignored will of the people & rejected background checks. Im not giving up. Constituents will know they obeyed gun lobby and not them.

Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator of New York @SenGillibrand

W/90% support, it's absurd that we were unable to summon the political will to pass universal background checks. The Senate truly is broken.

And Episcopal priest Laura Toepfer ‏@HeyToepfer

They sang a love song when marriage equality passed in NZ. What song should we sing to mark amendments failed in Senate?
Comments (3)

You need a license to drive. You need a license to fish. In Pennsylvania, you need a license to put a canoe in PA water and you need a license to cut hair. You will soon need ID to vote. You need a license to marry with a blood test. But to buy an assault weapon, large capacity magazines and ammunition, not so much. Shameful. I'm surprised but grateful that both of my PA senators voted for the bill.

[asmuhl - please sign your name when you comment at the Café - thanks ed.]

Gosh, I think we say "thank you" as that particular party continues to self destruct. I hate to say it aloud, lest they hear me, but "You guys are doing swell!"

Cowards and nutcases generate these attacks; Cowards and nutcases refuse to take any steps to stop them.

Oops, asmuhl comment was by Andy Muhl


[Thanks. ed.]

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space