Man Church = Church Fail?
Ben Myers, at the highly recommended Faith and Theology Blog, pointed us to the "Man Church" blog which led him to quote both Karl Barth and Paul's letter to Galatians as he made the claim that "Man Church = Church Fail':
Ben Myers at Faith and Theology blog:
A couple of readers have pointed me to this sublime aberration: Man Church. The website describes it as "church the way a man expects it to be done. No singing, short sermon, time to talk with other guys, no women present, and coffee and donuts. That's the way men want to do church."
...
Here is a bit of his quotation of Karl Barth on the subject:
Everything which points in the direction of male or female seclusion, or of religious or secular orders or communities, or of male or female segregation – if it is undertaken in principle and not consciously and temporarily as an emergency measure – is obviously disobedience. (Church Dogmatics III/4, 165)
Does your church have men's groups, women's groups?
(Do your clergy participate in single-gender support groups?)
What is your take?
What about separating out the children / youth? Is this also "disobedience"?

Who would make the coffee? LOL
Posted by Ann Fontaine
|
July 26, 2010 10:14 AM
"Man Church is church the way a man expects it to be done."
Hmmm... How about "doing church" the way *GOD* expects it to be done, instead of how the latest "target market" *du jour* thinks it should be done, which, more often than not, results in the watering down and trivialization of Christianity -- to even the most absurd and carnival sideshow levels?
"In Christ, there is no difference between Jew and Greek, slave and free person, male and female. You are all the same in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:28) Some Christians are males, some are female, all are human. Deal with it. Interact.
And just what is a "definite manly focus"? Tossing Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, with its turning the other cheek and praying for those who curse you, because that doesn't square with the "kick butt and take names later" macho ethos our culture pushes as genuine masculinity?
It just gets "curiouser and curiouser" out there on the religious marketplace... Not to mention more ludicrous.
Gregory Orloff
Posted by Gregory
|
July 26, 2010 12:27 PM
Men don't sing? In Manchester before a ManU vs. Glasgow, the pubs were jammed with men singing, mostly sitting outdoors- music conversations, competitions, pub v. pub etc. We sing in church because people sing - except in consumerist culture where people say "I can't sing" or "I don't sing," or...where 'non-singing' men are caught in the musical version of performance anxiety. Is that manly?
Posted by Donald Schell
|
July 26, 2010 4:02 PM
So, maybe before we pull the hymnal out of the pew rack, we all need to pour ourselves a pint.
Posted by Matthew Buterbaugh+
|
July 26, 2010 4:54 PM
Matthew, that would surely improve the congregational singing, but we choristers will probably continue to wait until after the service to imbibe (our inhibitions are already loose enough, and alcohol really isn't very good for the voice) :-)
Posted by Bill Ghrist
|
July 26, 2010 7:15 PM
Matthew,
You may enjoy recalling this earlier advocate for pulling ourselves a pint and lifting male voices in song, William Blake-
Dear mother, dear mother, the church is cold,
But the ale-house is healthy and pleasant and warm;
Besides I can tell where I am used well,
Such usage in Heaven will never do well.
But if at the church they would give us some ale,
And a pleasant fire our souls to regale,
We'd sing and we'd pray all the live-long day,
Nor ever once wish from the church to stray.
Then the parson might preach, and drink, and sing,
And we'd be as happy as birds in the spring;
And modest Dame Lurch, who is always at church,
Would not have bandy children, nor fasting, nor birch.
And God, like a father rejoicing to see
His children as pleasant and happy as he,
Would have no more quarrel with the Devil or the barrel,
But kiss him, and give him both drink and apparel.
Posted by Donald Schell
|
July 26, 2010 9:09 PM
Precisely, Presbyter Donald. The insulting thing about this "Man Church" marketing gimmick is that it presumes men are, by nature, incurious Neanderthals who don't *want* to sing, hear a good sermon or delve deeply into questions of God and our relationship with him -- all the things I want out of going to church, and can't find anywhere else in our secular culture! It's a "selling point" based on a very shallow idea of what men are, and what constitutes manhood and manliness.
Gregory Orloff
Posted by Gregory
|
July 26, 2010 9:29 PM