Crowd behavior: one understanding does not describe all

Last night, hundreds of Penn State students took to the streets to support Joe Paterno after he was fired over the child sex abuse scandal. The crowd turned ugly as the night went on.


Many will point to this as another example of "dangerous mob mentality".

The magazine Intelligent Life, in its Nov/Dec issue, just looked closely at crowd mentality in a thoughtful article by Ian Leslie:

Crowds, we are often told, are dumb. They obliterate reason, sentience and accountability, turning individuals into helpless copycats. Commentators on the riots offered different explanations but most agreed that crowd psychology was part of the problem. “The dominant trait of the crowd is to reduce its myriad individuals to a single, dysfunctional persona,” wrote the novelist Will Self in the New Statesman. “The crowd is stupider than the averaging of its component minds.” The violence was said to have spread like a “contagion” through the crowd, facilitated by social media. For those who wanted to sound scientific, the term to drop was “deindividuation”: the loss of identity and moral responsibility that can occur in a group.

The riot at Penn State seems to fit this description of crowd mentality. Certainly, this particular crowd was more concerned with the perceived "tragedy" to their football program and tradition than about the real tragedy of the children who were sexually abused at Penn State.

The article (which was written before last night's event), quickly reminded us that the power of the crowd does not necessarily lead people to the worst:

Earlier this year, the world watched a crowd bring down an autocratic government, by the simple act of coming together in one place, day after day, night after night. Egyptian protesters created a micro-society in Tahrir Square, organising garbage collection, defending themselves when they needed to, but otherwise ensuring the protest remained peaceful. As well as courage, this took intelligence, discipline and restraint. Few international observers accused the crowd in Tahrir Square of being dysfunctional, or of turning its members into animals. The Tahrir protesters also used social media, but rather than calling for a ban, as some in Britain did after the riots, people wrote eulogies to the liberating potential of Twitter. It seems that not all crowds are bad. But when bad things happen, the crowd gets the blame.

The article goes on to cover a history of looking at crowds, both positively and negatively.

John Drury, a psychologist at Sussex university who studies crowd behaviour, believes that the idea that crowds induce irrational behaviour and erase individuality just isn’t supported by the evidence. First, most crowds aren’t violent. The crowd in the shopping mall or at a music festival is usually calm and ordered. Even crowds that include conflicting groups, as at football matches, are more likely to be peaceful than not. Second, even when crowds do turn violent, they aren’t necessarily irrational. In the 18th century England was afflicted by food riots. If ever there was an atavistic reason to riot, that was surely it. But the historian E.P. Thompson showed that the riots took place not when food was at its most scarce but when people saw merchants selling grain at a steep profit; the rioters were motivated by a rational sense of injustice rather than the “animal” drive of hunger.

Leslie concludes that, "Crowds are as likely to bring out the best in us as the worst."

What are your thoughts?

Comments (2)

If there is a moment to consider the activities of a crowd here, it cannot be ethically separated from the victims of sexual abuse that preceded this decision.

However insufficient or naive we might find the activities of Catholic (and other) clergy and bishops in their attempts to reconcile, reform, or cloister away from temptation those clergy who abused their positions and relationships over the past decades, it stands now to be observed that the moral outrage at that insufficiency is to be foiled against a riotous destruction of property that a beloved football coach's consequence initiated.

A facebook friend linked to this http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/11/something-is-rotten-at-penn-state.html

It includes language I can't help but find discouraging from students, who declared, "make no mistake, the board started this riot by firing our coach. They tarnished a legend." I've worked with 19-year-olds in my time in ministry; they are capable of incredible perspective and maturity. This is a sad example of misplaced priorities and a failure to stand with the victims, and my prayers today include hopes that this may become a sobering moment in the future for all who reflect on it.

"Few international observers accused the crowd in Tahrir Square of being dysfunctional, or of turning its members into animals."

Um, CBS reporter Lara Logan might (understandably) have another view.

***

I used to live just over the hill from Happy Valley. You have to picture the Government of Italy firing the Pope (*), to really understand what happened last night in Pennsylvania.

JC Fisher

(*) And who's to say they shouldn't...for the SAME reason!!! :-0

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space