Duncan issues "godly directive" to his diocese

Bob Duncan, The Archbishop of the one province ACNA, bishop of the ACNA Diocese of Pittsburgh has issued a statement to his diocese concerning the settlement that the Somerset Anglican Fellowship negotiated with the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh without the input, fore-knowledge or approval of the Diocese.

We are very concerned that a congregation thought itself to be so in jeopardy as to necessitate secret legal action. ... In light of these very serious developments, I feel compelled to issue a godly directive to all of the clergy of the diocese not to engage in, conduct, or conclude negotiations without first discussing such actions with me, or with Canon Mary, and with our chancellor.
There have been rumblings of buyer's remorse in Duncan's diocese. Will tightening his grip improve matters, or widen the fissures?

Secret plans? Bob Duncan, can you say Chapman Memo (facsimile of original)? Is this directive as "godly" as the secret plan the Washington Post uncovered in 2004?

About property, the ACNA Constitution states,

ARTICLE XII: OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY

All church property, both real and personal, owned by each member congregation now and in the future is and shall be solely and exclusively owned by each member congregation and shall not be subject to any trust interest in favor of the Province or any other claim of ownership arising out of the canon law of this Province. Where property is held in a different manner by any diocese or grouping, such ownership shall be preserved.

ACNA's Canons state,
Concerning Property Ownership
All congregational property, real and personal, owned by a member congregation is and shall be solely and exclusively owned by the congregation and shall not be subject to any trust in favor of the Province or other claim of ownership arising out of the canon law of the Church; neither may any Diocese assert any such claim over the property of any of its congregations without the express written consent of the congregation. Where property is held in a different manner by any Diocese or grouping, such ownership shall be preserved.
The Constitution and Canons of Duncan's diocese says the same concerning property ownership. There is no requirement that a parish give the diocese advance notice of negotiations with the proper owners of the property (that is, the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh).

The entire letter follows.
__________

Letter from Robert Duncan to the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh (source)

Dear Friends,

Attached is a letter describing an agreement made by Somerset Anglican Fellowship with the TEC Diocese. Some of you have already read about this in the newspaper or received an email; many of you have communicated with me your concerns that there might be many “secret deals” being made which will leave many congregations “on their own.” Here is some information about the agreement, and our current situation, that we thought it would be helpful for you to know.

1) Somerset Anglican Fellowship negotiated this settlement without the input or approval of the Diocese. In fact, we have reason to believe that the lawyer representing SAF advised them not to inform the Anglican diocese. We are very concerned that a congregation thought itself to be so in jeopardy as to necessitate secret legal action.

2) St. Stephen’s, Sewickley and Church of the Savior, Ambridge have consulted legal counsel with regard to individual settlements with the TEC Diocese. Both parishes informed the Anglican Diocese at the time and both parishes have decided not to participate in any settlement without the involvement of the Diocese.

3) To the best of our knowledge, there are no other parishes which are unilaterally attempting to make a settlement with the TEC diocese.

4) The Anglican Diocese remains committed to finding the best solution for each of its parishes in light of the recent legal decisions. We also continue to hope for and look for some kind of settlement that would benefit all of our congregations.

5) Please do not hesitate to email or call Canon Mary, Geoff Chapman (Chair of the Standing Committee) or Jonathan Millard (Standing Committee member) or me if you have further questions or concerns.

In light of these very serious developments, I feel compelled to issue a godly directive to all of the clergy of the diocese not to engage in, conduct, or conclude negotiations without first discussing such actions with me, or with Canon Mary, and with our chancellor.

Faithfully,

The Most Rev. Robert Wm. Duncan

Comments (5)

Sure sounds desperate to me. Because this organization was created on such a cracked foundation, the Canons of this organization also reflect that any parish may retain their property - since these guys seem to be losing lawsuits left and right. They want to be able to be free of further litigation should a parish in ACNA wish to break away at any point (even if to rejoin TEC). Interesting (or sad).

[Episcopalbrother - Great to have a new commenter. Note our policy in future -- we require commenters to sign their full names to comments. - ed.]

Regarding the Chapman memo, I've just been handed these this memo:

The confidentiality language is something else. Here is the now president of the ACNA Pittsburgh Standing Committee (one of the “must check with” list) instructing this memo to be secret.

Paragraph 1 – “We seek to retain ownership of our property as we move into this realignment.”

In the FAQs, the need for confidentiality, i.e. secrecy, is touted in amazingly conspiratorial terms.

Precisely the type of autocratic behaviour they're forever accusing "Mrs Schori" of. Irony not XXDuncan's strong point, is it?

Lapinbizarre

There may be no legal _requirement_ for them to give the Anglican Diocese advance notice of their negotiations with the Episcopal Diocese, but it's bad form for them not to, at least if they intend to remain in the Anglican Diocese, which apparently isn't the case with at least one of the parishes that negotiated a separate peace. And even though membership in the diocese is voluntary, the diocese has every right to set conditions for continued membership.

Of course, the new Anglican dioceses claim no trust interest in parish property because that would make them look like the evil Episcopal Church. Now that Duncan fears defections from his new dioceses, I wonder if he is having second thoughts.

The stipulation arising out of the Calvary lawsuit (by which Duncan is bound) says that churches that want to leave the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh must negotiate with the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh. In requiring that negotiations be reported to the Anglican diocese, which has no standing in the agreement, Duncan, by making his missive a “godly directive,” is threatening disciplinary action against clergy who disobey. I’m sure this will endear the Anglican clergy to their episcopal strongman and his kleptocratic diocese.

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space