Can 1,000 Catholic priests be wrong?

In an op-ed essay for The Times of London, journalist Oliver Kamm responds to the arguments made by Catholic clergy opposed to British Prime Minister David Cameron's plans to permit same-sex marriages in the United Kingdom.

He writes:

More than 1,000 priests have signed a letter to the Telegraph protesting against same-sex marriage. They maintain that the Government’s forthcoming Equal Marriage Bill heralds a return to religious persecution. The Bishop of Portsmouth maintains that “it is quite Orwellian to try to redefine marriage”, and terms the proposed reform “totalitarian”.

It’s tempting to dismiss this as inflammatory nonsense, because that’s what it is. Even so, two points are worth drawing out.

First, the clerical opponents of gay marriage continually commit the logical fallacy of begging the question (ie, assuming in their premises the truth of what they’re arguing for). They complain that the Government’s proposals “redefine marriage” – a redefinition that they are conscientiously and by Church teaching bound to oppose.

Yet the argument of the proponents of reform, including The Times, is explicitly that we are not redefining marriage. We merely seek to extend marriage rights to couples who are now barred from them on no better ground than that they are of the same sex. Reforming marriage to enable a woman to own property independently of her husband was a change of far greater scope than same-sex marriage will be. It was opposed on similar grounds of its supposedly being contrary to natural law. And it was obviously right and just. Same-sex marriage is a modest reform of similar type.

Second, because of that point, the Church will damage itself by the vitriol and hyperbole of its campaign. That’s a prediction, not a complaint – indeed it’s a scenario that I welcome and look forward to.

Comments (4)

I read somewhere that the 1,000 signatures represent about 25% of the relevant group. One suspects that the signatories are those who hope to become monsignors and bishops. Reasonable positions are not routes to advancement today in the Roman church -- see, for example, the noncardinal Archbishop of Westminster.

To answer the question of the headline- Yes.

Really? They would be the victims? After all these centuries of persecution they would be the victims? This makes me quite angry. Would that they were so passionate about mercy, compassion and justice for the oppressed.

I am not in any way anti-Catholic, but on the topic of human intimacy and love and their proper expression, the church has no moral authority whatsover. In fact, the opposite pertains: the Roman Catholic church has seriously negative brand equity on these issues.

Eric Bonetti

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space