Live: Rowan rising

By Jim Naughton

The Archbishop of Canterbury is on a bit of a roll here at the Lambeth Conference. He has clearly established himself as the undisputed leader of this potentially fractious gathering of bishops, a fact perhaps best attested to by his peers bursting into spontaneous applause on two occassions--first after his presidential address at the opening of the conference, and again yesterday when a photographer asked him to take his place in the front row at the taking of yesterday's 'class picture.'


Williams' enhanced stature rests not on the assumption of a popular political position, but on what several bishops have described as the deep theological insights that he displayed during the conference-opening retreat, and on his commitment to a process that, despite hiccups, seems to be working.

Williams' faith in the process was most evident last night after evening prayer when he told the bishops and spouses assembled in the big blue tent, the central gathering place at the conference, that he was aware some of them were eager to begin the discussion of human sexuality that has been described as "the elephant in the room." However, he said that as soon as the issue was broached in the "indaba" groups, the primary forum for theological give-and-take, it was likely to dominate the remainder of the conference. Many bishops found other issues more pressing, Williams said, and he wanted to make sure those issues received their due.

Several members of the conference design team had suggested moving the discussion of sexuality forward on the schedule--It is scheduled to be discussed on Thursday.--but Williams, who believes the process is unfolding well--decided against it, telling the design team members to trust the process they had created.

Whether the archbishop's increasing influence over the gathering will endure three sessions of open hearings on contentious issues of sexuality and church authority scheduled for this week remains to be seen, but he enters the week with a strong hand.

Comments (1)

I have been following the informationless blogging and reporting since the conference began. It seems to me that the real issue has to do with this conference looking more like a medival Roman process than a 2008 one.
This would never happen in TEC because major decisions about the church would include laity and clergy.
One of the main reasons CoE has had such huge loss in membership and influence in its own country has to do with how the general public views it. When the bishops marched in London, they were mostly ignored by the British public.
So, the body of bishops from around the world is so focus on whether or not to split over gays (which most post modern folks in the developed world find to be extremely bigoted)will continue to meet behind closed doors and then decide without priest, or laity, or the only open gay bishop in the communion about the place or not place of gays are in the communion. I just hope that TEC bishops stand their ground. Our church would be better off (as painful as that might be) without the approval of bigots to do God's work.
And I also think TEC's willingness to treat gays with grace will in the long run help with with evangelism in this country.
ABC would be better off in a monestery, so that his sincere desire to be a godly man (which I believe) would not be so hurtful to gays in general and to Gene Robinson in particular while the secular world looks on and thinks, "Why would I join up with those folks?

--Tim Lusk

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space