Anderson and advisors meet with Archbishop Williams

Updated with Mary Frances Schjonberg's well-reported ENS story that includes comments from people who were in other meetings with the archbishop.

By Jim Naughton

Bonnie Anderson, president of the House of Deputies, and four members of her council of advice met for half an hour today with the Most Rev. Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The topic was the distinctive governance system of the Episcopal Church, and the friction that system sometimes creates for Williams and others in the Anglican Communion.

Anderson said she and her council expressed to Williams their concern that communications and requests to the Episcopal Church are typically addressed only to the Church’s House of Bishops, which does not have authority, on its own, to respond to them.

“We are a church of more than one order of voices,” Anderson said to several reporters after the meeting.

Sally Johnson, Anderson’s chancellor and a deputy from the Diocese of Minnesota, said that the group told Williams it hoped that requests to the Episcopal Church be addressed to the Episcopal Church, rather than to the House of Bishops. “Allow The Episcopal Church to decide for it who decides,” she said.

“No one can respond and bind the Episcopal Church except the General Convention,” Johnson added. “These may seem like fine distinctions to other people, but to us they are foundational.“

The Rev. Jim Simons, chair of the Dispatch of Business Committee, and a deputy from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, said Williams expressed his concern that the Episcopal Church’s governing system took too long to reach conclusions. “It is difficult to hold some decisions for three years,” said Simons, adding that the group discussed “possible alternatives,” although only in an informal way.

Williams told the group that Episcopalians had to be aware that in some parts of the Communion, “bishops only want to hear from other bishops,” Johnson said.

“We believe God guides us using all four rudders,” said the Rev. Frank Wade, chaplain to the House of Deputies and a deputy from the Diocese of Washington. “Bishops, priests, deacons and laity. Other provinces may use one.

“We are a problem for other people that we move more slowly,” he said, adding that Episcopalians believe this allows them to consult more broadly and make better decisions.

Byron Rushing, a deputy from the Diocese of Massachusetts said there was no question that Williams understands the polity of the Episcopal Church, but that he clearly has reservations about it.

"Our great deep hope” is that all orders in the Episcopal Church will be addressed in future communications with the Anglican Communion," Anderson said. “My evil twin thinks that maybe [they think] that if we are ignored enough we will just go away...or won't be legitimized."

The bishops of the Episcopal Church are under “significant pressure” from some parts of the Anglican Communion to claim authority that the Church’s constitution does not give them, she said.

During the meeting, Williams also spoke briefly with Simons of Pittsburgh and Cindy Smith, a lay woman from the Diocese of San Joaquin, about the experience of Episcopalians in diocese from which a majority of the members and clergy had left the Church to join more theologically conservative provinces in the Anglican Communion.

“We wanted him to understand what‘s going on and the toll that it has taken,” Simons said. The conversation, which touched on rebuilding efforts, was “encouraging,” according to Simons.

Comments (9)

"Williams expressed his concern that the Episcopal Church’s governing system took too long to reach conclusions"

We are too slow?

C of E sure seems slow to me with regards to ordaining women as bishops and the endless meetings to decide that they still need more time.

So far his visit is less than impressive...

Rev. Kurt Huber
St. Peter's, Monore (CT)

"The Rev. Jim Simons...said Williams expressed his concern that the Episcopal Church’s governing system took too long to reach conclusions." As compared to whom? The C of E is still dragging its feet about consecrating women to the episcopate after how many years? Lambeth has been trying to get the Anglican Communion to talk and think seriously about committed same-sex relationships for several decades, with limited response. We may indeed sometimes get impatient about the time it takes us to reach decisions, but we do reach decisions, and we do it faster than many other provinces.

"Williams told the group that Episcopalians had to be aware that in some parts of the Communion, 'bishops only want to hear from other bishops,' Johnson said." And why is this our problem?

"Byron Rushing...said there was no question that Williams understands the polity of the Episcopal Church, but that he clearly has reservations about it." Who asked him? We understand the polity of the Church of England, and believe me, we have lots of reservations about it. Most of the time we hold our tongues.

The Episcopal Church has had bishops/clergy/laity synodical government for 220 years. This is considerably longer than any other province in the Anglican Communion, including our blessed mother the C of E. I think it's time for them to get off our back. We don't tell them how to govern their provinces (well, not too often!). They need to stop trying to tell us how to govern ours.


"Williams expressed his concern that the Episcopal Church’s governing system took too long to reach conclusions." Thought the problem was that the Church's governing system comes to conclusions too quickly - ordination of women; consecration of gays. Some folks are never satisfied. Make your mind up, Rowan.

Roger Mortimer

Williams told the group that Episcopalians had to be aware that in some parts of the Communion, “bishops only want to hear from other bishops,” Johnson said.

Too bad, so sad! >:-/

JC Fisher

Thinking of Bp Stephen Sykes thoughtful, historical insights into Anglican polity, governance, ecclesiology, and theology, this statement stuns:

Williams told the group that Episcopalians had to be aware that in some parts of the Communion, “bishops only want to hear from other bishops,” Johnson said.

Since the time of Sovereign in Parliament, laypersons have always had an active role in the governance, polity, and theology of the CofE, and do so as well in many Churches of this Communion in a number of forms, many of which have a conciliar shape in some fashion. I think our ecclesial deficit lies perhaps at least partially not where Archbishop Williams thinks it might, but in an "Anglican" deficit wherein some of our bishops worldwide think ourselves modeled on Rome, forget that this is not the case. Laity are a part of our governance, thinking, and life. That we have bishops and an active lay order is part of what makes us distinctly "Anglican."

Not long ago we were accused of moving to fast, now we're accused of moving to slow. One cannot have their cake and eat it too. It kind of looks like those who accuse others of reading the Bible selectively and then go on to themselves do the same thing but claim that they read the Bible literally.

As the FoCAs bring the dynamics of the "Chapman report" to the ABC's home turf - maybe he will remember the people of San Joaquin, Pittsburgh, and Ft. Worth and call them for advice.

I do think someone should have reminded Archbishop Rowan that the "Supreme Governor of the Church of England" is a LAYWOMAN, and that he was apppointed by her.

If this meeting with the ABC can be reported openly why is his meeting with 8 gay deputies shrouded in secrecy?

I think his concerns over how long it takes us to do something probably has to do with the ACC as well as the covenant process. OCICBW but he is obviously frustrated about something.

And as to some bishops wanting to deal only with bishops, I remember a recent incident where some bishops from other countries were having trouble with having to express their opinions in the presence of our Presiding Bishop.

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space