Pastors seek free speech subsidy

Yesterday, at the urging of the conservative Allied Defense Fund, some 33 pastors endorsed a presidential candidate (John McCain, presumably, and ironically, given his history with right wing religious leaders) in an effort to provoke a legal showdown with the Internal Revenue Service.

The Atlanta Journal and Constitution's story is representative.

The Rev. Jody Hice fired a verbal volley Sunday in a battle that he believes will return the United States to its American Revolutionary roots.

From his pulpit at Bethlehem First Baptist Church outside of Atlanta, he urged his congregation to vote for Sen. John McCain and to not vote for Sen. Barack Obama.

He based his recommendations on McCain’s opposition to abortion and gay marriage and Obama’s support of those issues, Hice told the Barrow County church packed with about 400 listeners.

“These are not political issues,” Hice said. “There are moral issues.”

They may be moral issues, but Internal Revenue Service regulations say clergy cannot make public political endorsements to their congregations without risking the tax-exempt status of their house of worship.

Perhaps the most revealing quote comes for a story from The Los Angeles Times via The Baltimore Sun:

"I am angry because the government and the IRS and some Christians have taken away the rights of pastors," (Southern Baptist minister Wiley S.) Drake said to about 45 people at his service. "I have a right to endorse anybody I doggone well please. And if they don't like that, too bad."

The Rev. Drake does have the right to endorse anybody he chooses--but not from his pulpit. This isn't because the IRS has taken away his right to free speech, it is because they don't think taxpayers should subsidize his right to free speech. If his church wants to pay taxes on its income, it can endorse whomever it wants as publicly as it pleases.

The Rev. Drake and his allies don't want the same rights as everyone else, they want special rights for religious leaders.

Comments (2)

Someone might let on to Southern Baptist minister Wiley S. Drake that "doggone" is a thinly disguised variant of "God damn", an expression I gather is frowned upon in most S'n Baptist circles.

No one has *taken away* his or anyone else's right. The U.S. Constitution (Bro. Drake has heard of this document, hasn't he? Apparently not.) *guarantees* his right to endorse whomever he wants and to practice his faith as he sees fit. But as the post says, he doesn't give a doggone about anyone else's guarantee of the same rights, but wants to misuse his position to impose his political and religious views on everyone else. It is unconstitutional and so it is unamerican (and I daresay *unchristian*). Creeping fascism, anyone?

Marc P. Vance

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space