Labor, religion and the state of Wisconsin

Religion Dispatches has published some thought provoking reports and essays on the struggle of public employees to hang on to their collective bargaining rights. Taken as a whole, they should inspire both hope and concern among those who assume that the right to collective bargaining is, well, a right.

In What Religion Looks Like, Wisconsin Edition, Kim Bobo reports that most of the state's most high-profile religious leaders offered public employees early support. Among those leaders was the Right Rev. Steven A. Miller, the Episcopal Bishop of Milwaukee, who wrote:

I believe we can all agree that our baptismal vow to “respect the dignity of every human being” is not served by a majority simply pushing through legislation because they have the votes necessary to do so. As Christians, it is our duty and call to make sure that everyone has a place at the table and every voice has the opportunity to be heard. Respecting the dignity of every human being requires taking the time to have honest and faithful conversation that respects the rights and freedom of all.

More recently, however, Peter Laarman, has argued that organized religion's support for organized labor is fairly tepid, and has been for several decades. Among the reasons he cites is this one:

Identity politics among religious liberals: The Christian Century review of Winner Take All Politics quotes the authors’ spot-on analysis of progressive religious leaders’ conspicuous lack of interest in worker struggles in recent decades. In a word, these leaders had other priorities: women’s rights, LGBT issues, environmentalism, etc. “The result,” say Hacker and Pierson, “was a boon for the post-materialist causes of more affluent liberals, but it left traditional material causes with only a handful of energetic backers.” I couldn’t put it any better. In my own work, I am sometimes asked why I, as a gay clergy leader, remain so committed to worker issues. The implication: Don’t I know what’s really important?

Meanwhile, supporters for unregulated capitalism are developing a theology of their own. They believe God hates unions, and opposing them is holy work. Peter Montgomery sheds some light on their thinking:

One of the most striking examples of this theory reaching into the political realm is found in an early Christian Coalition Leadership Manual, co-authored by Coalition founder Ralph Reed in 1990. A section titled “God’s Delegated Authority in the World,” which argues that “God established His pattern for work as well as in the family and in the church,” cites four Bible passages instructing slaves to be obedient to their masters, including 1 Peter 2:18-19:

Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. For it is commendable if a man bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God.
And then, the astonishing lesson drawn by Christian Coalition leaders from these slaves-obey-your-masters passages:

Of course, slavery was abolished in this country many years ago, so we must apply these principles to the way Americans work today, to employees and employers: Christians have a responsibility to submit to the authority of their employers, since they are designated as part of God’s plan for the exercise of authority on the earth by man.

Slavery also makes an appearance in “Indivisible,” a booklet of essays being aggressively promoted by the Heritage Foundation as part of its campaign to assert that genuine fiscal conservatism cannot be separated from social conservatism. In one essay, anti-gay activist Bishop Harry Jackson writes that minimum wage laws “[remind] me of slavery.

Bishop Jackson might benefit from spending some time with Rerum Novarum.

Pope Leo XIII had a few things to say about "The Condition of Labor" in 1891, including this:

48. In the last place, employers and workmen may of themselves effect much, in the matter We are treating, by means of such associations and organizations as afford opportune aid to those who are in distress, and which draw the two classes more closely together. Among these may be enumerated societies for mutual help; various benevolent foundations established by private persons to provide for the workman, and for his widow or his orphans, in case of sudden calamity, in sickness, and in the event of death; and institutions for the welfare of boys and girls, young people, and those more advanced in years.

49. The most important of all are workingmen's unions, for these virtually include all the rest. History attests what excellent results were brought about by the artificers' guilds of olden times. They were the means of affording not only many advantages to the workmen, but in no small degree of promoting the advancement of art, as numerous monuments remain to bear witness. Such unions should be suited to the requirements of this our age - an age of wider education, of different habits, and of far more numerous requirements in daily life. It is gratifying to know that there are actually in existence not a few associations of this nature, consisting either of workmen alone, or of workmen and employers together, but it were greatly to be desired that they should become more numerous and more efficient.

Comments (2)

Thanks for this coverage. In some sense the woes of the labor movement parallel those of the mainline churches these days: old systems not able to adapt to new conditions. This has been true of the labor movement since the Reagan area when the move to destroy organized labor began to gain momentum.

It was a huge betrayal of labor by owners and especially anti-communist/socialist politicians and religious leaders who had long been supported by the pro-capitalist labor movement that survived the purges of the 20s and 30s.

What was left was a labor movement that saw itself as having a common interest with owners in protecting the owner-worker structure. While they supported the civil-rights movement they also supported the war in Vietnam and nearly anything that came down the line as anti-communist. So while gaining liberal and progressive friends through the former they lost them through the latter. And frankly, in dealing with them on organizing issues it was their way or no way. You could work under their direction, but they were opposed to people suggesting they might need to change.

Changes occurred though as imaginative leadership developed in some parts of the Teamsters Union and with the growth of the Service Employees' International Union which began with African American janitors and grew to include public workers and health care workers. Indeed the SEIU disaffiliated with the AFL-CIO in 2005 over issues of stale strategies.

The Religious Right, which morphed out of the anti-communist right with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, has carried forward the effort as alluded to in your essay. Indeed The Episcopal Church has been the target of one such branch of the the Institute for Religion and Democracy. This so called moral majority has favored capital at the expense of workers as Reed's equation of all workers with slaves shows. He has somehow missed all of the passages that talk about independent workers in Israel! More proof that evangelical fundamentalists don't read the Bible.

(As an aside the first Labor Action involves Jacob and Laban. After Laban switches daughters and gets another 7 years of labor for Rachel (a contract, no?) Jacob proposes that his pay be all the blemished or spotted sheep and goats. He then sets out to breed for spots, effectively cheating Laban!)

Finally though you ask the question about Progressives. The biggest part of the problem is that Progressives are generally to free thinking and independent of mind to gather behind a movement to push it forward. AND, to boot, they will not commit their money in significant amounts to achieve the same influence as wielded by evangelical fundies. Until such time as we are willing to put our cash on the line, we can expect to be taken to the laundry by the Right. No Cash, No Influence.

In an odd way I welcome the debacle now taking place. It is the end game of the Right with respect to labor. Pushed to the wall labor and those of us who support people organizing to bargain collectively will have to make some new commitment to protecting and extending these rights.

Otherwise we will welcome in a new era of wage slavery, sharecropping, child labor, unsafe workplaces and severely reduced standards of living for regular working folks.

Christians have a responsibility to submit to the authority of their employers, since they are designated as part of God’s plan for the exercise of authority on the earth by man.

Gobsmacking. Utterly.

JC Fisher

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space