Michigan's immoral "moral exception"

In Michigan, bullying is immoral, dangerous and wrong. Except when the bully thinks God is on his side and the victim is gay.

Michigan's anti-bullying law prohibits bullying except when the person doing the bullying is acting on a "sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction." The bill also does not specifically prohibut bullying based on "race, gender, sexual preference, etc." Given the fact that the bill is named for a young man who committed suicide after an incident of anti-gay bullying in 2002, this is appalling.

Talking Points Memo:

SB 137, also called “Matt’s Safe School Law” after 14-year old Matt Eppling who committed suicide in 2002 after being bullied, was approved in the state Senate by a 26-11 party line vote, and will now head to the House.

The bill lays out what exactly constitutes bullying, but in one key part it says that the legislation does not prohibit First Amendment rights, and “does not prohibit a statement of a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction of a school employee, school volunteer, pupil, or a pupil’s parent or guardian.”

The Detroit News reports that Senate Dems tried to add language that would specifically prohibit bullying on the basis of race, gender, sexual preference, etc., but were unsuccessful.

“I am ashamed that this could be Michigan’s bill on anti-bullying when in fact it is a ‘bullying is OK in Michigan law,’” Kevin Eppling, the father of the bill’s namesake, said in a letter.

Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer (D) called the final version of the bill a “blueprint for bullying” in a floor speech. “Here today you claim to be protecting kids and you’re actually putting them in more danger.”

Watch Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer explain her "no" vote.

Comments (2)

So I wonder, do those who wanted people with
"sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction" to be exempt from this law realize they have, in fact, enshrined in law that people with "sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction" are bullies?

The Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan had, at least in their own eyes, "sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions." Does that excuse the bullying (and worse) they did? Of course not. This law is bogus. Religion and morality never can be justification for intimidating and hurting other human beings. To think so is not in accord with Christ Jesus.

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space