No. Michigan plan after rejection of their election
UPDATED
Following the rejection of the election of the Rev. Kevin Thew Forrester as their next bishop, the Diocese of Northern Michigan approved a new process for selecting its next bishop at its recently concluded convention at St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church in Escanaba, Mi.
After lengthy discussion, the convention approved a resolution that adopted a search plan that includes:Forming a search committee engaged in discernment;
Building on the work of the previous search committee (known as the Episcopal Ministry Discernment Team);
Communicating effectively with the wider church;
Exploring the possibility of working with a search consultant;
Using a broad process to collect the names of potential candidates;
Intending to present multiple candidates to the electing convention;
Using the petition process for adding names to the slate.
More on Northern Michigan here.
UPDATE
Doug LeBlanc reports in The Living Church:
Both in her verbal report to the diocesan convention and in an interview with The Living Church, standing committee president Linda Piper said that poor communication harmed the consents process for Fr. Thew Forrester.
“Somehow we did not communicate clearly our process, and we’re working to change that,” she told The Living Church. “In our congregations there is a ministry discernment process. We based our process on a discernment process that we’ve used at the congregational level for 20 years.”
In her report to the diocesan convention, Ms. Piper acknowledged widespread feelings of anger and grief regarding the previous election.
“I don’t believe that any of us were prepared for the shock and disappointment, the anger and the sorrow, that came as a result of the failure of the consent process,” she said. “We weren’t ready for trial by internet. We never imagined that what we know to be true and right for us would cause such a reaction from the wider church.”
UPDATE 11 p.m.
The Rev Terry Martin, reports at his blog Fr. Jake Stops the World:
After a healthy discussion (much passion, but no heat), the amendment to strike the petition process was voted down. Then, after a few changes in the wording, the resolution was passed.It's a good resolution, in that it should silence the critics of "the process" that were shouting so loud during the last election. To those critics...perhaps you might want to learn a little bit about Mutual Ministry before deciding to challenge what these folks are doing?
Regardless of who Northern Michigan's next candidate is, no doubt there will still be those who love a good witch hunt expending hours googling up every statement, sermon or liturgy that person ever made public...
Read the Press Release below:
DIOCESE OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN BEGINS BISHOP SEARCH PROCESS
Annual Convention Discusses Past Year, Passes New Resolution
MARQUETTE, Mi., November 2, 2009—The Diocese of Northern Michigan approved a new process for selecting its next bishop at its recently concluded convention at St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church in Escanaba, Mi.
After lengthy discussion, the convention approved a resolution that adopted a search plan that includes:
Forming a search committee engaged in discernment;
Building on the work of the previous search committee (known as the Episcopal Ministry Discernment Team);
Communicating effectively with the wider church;Exploring the possibility of working with a search consultant;
Using a broad process to collect the names of potential candidates;
Intending to present multiple candidates to the electing convention;
Using the petition process for adding names to the slate.
An amendment to remove the petition process from the search was defeated after two visitors—the Rt. Rev. William D. Persell, retired Bishop of Chicago and assisting bishop in the Diocese of Ohio, and the Rev. Canon Cindy Voorhees of the Diocese of Los Angeles—urged the delegates to preserve the right to submit petition nominees.
“The petition process provides insurance against a search process gone awry,” said Bishop Persell. “It also provides assurance to the wider church that you intend to elect your next bishop in an open and transparent way.”
The search committee will be comprised of two members selected by each of the diocese’s four geographic regions; one member from the Diocesan Council; and one from the Standing Committee. The Standing Committee may also appoint up to three members to ensure that the search committee is representative of the diocese. The search committee will likely begin its work in February 2010.
Persell and Voorhees were among five visitors from across the Church who attended the convention to offer support to the diocese, which has been without a bishop since the Rt. Rev. James Kelsey was killed in an automobile accident while returning from a visitation in June 2007.
The diocese’s previous search for a bishop ended in July when the Rev. Kevin Thew Forrester, a priest of the diocese, did not receive the necessary consents from the wider Church.
Bishop Tom Ray, who preceded Bishop Kelsey, now serves as Northern Michigan’s assisting bishop. “Bishop Ray has been our rock through all of this,” said Linda Piper, chair of the diocese’s Standing Committee.
On the first night of the convention, the Very Rev. Ernesto Medina, Dean for Urban Mission at Trinity Cathedral in Omaha and clergy deputy from the Diocese of Nebraska, led the convention in a process he developed called “Authority of Generations.” Convention attendees, in small groups, told stories and sang hymns that answered the question, “Where have you experienced God in the past year?” In summarizing the stories told, Medina said, “Fear and painful losses lead to calmness, and to God being present in the transitions of our life. Through our loss we find God’s spirit speaking through us.”
Dr. Fredrica Harris Thompsett, Mary Wolfe Professor Emerita of Historical Theology at Episcopal Divinity School, was the convention’s chaplain.
The Diocese of Northern Michigan, founded in 1895, comprises 27 congregations in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. For more information about the diocese, please visit the diocesan website.

Trial by internet: I suppose that's what it's come to.
We all need to understand that consents have become politicized - along with every other aspect of our governance. This is what schism brings, big fights over minor details as well as major issues.
Episcopal elections are now like secular ones; first there's the party primary (called diocesan convention), then comes the general election campaign (though the voters are restricted to bishops and standing committees).
A diocese that wants a new bishop had better hire a campaign manager to deal with 110 jurisdictions, aka the Electoral College. Don't farm this out to the old bishop's secretary. Get the consents in writing; please, no faxes or e-mails. Maybe Axelrod or Plouffe can suggest someone.
Even with a flawless process, if it can be litigated it will be. Expect an argument.
The process is skewed: your candidate had better be on the theological straight and narrow. Thumping the Prayer Book at key times is probably a good tactic, with occasional invocations of Richard Hooker and Julian of Norwich.
At least we don't require our bishops to be Straight White Males anymore; that's a little progress.
Still, who are we most likely to elect in the face of opposition, but cradle Episcopalians from upstanding families, preferably of pioneer stock, a graduate of Virginia or General with catholic and evangelical bona fides, never divorced, possessing a few well-scrubbed children of a suitable age, this one's a law student, that one's a Peace Corps nurse, along with the occasional banker or sitcom actress?
In today's environment, the safest possible choice is… a Straight White Male.
Isn't it reassuring how all this works out? The faith once delivered to the saints, y'know.
Posted by Josh Thomas
|
November 3, 2009 1:30 PM
Everything is always political, and that can be alright.
But we should note the Ordinal, about what a Bishop is supposed to be. A Bishop is not supposed to be an explorer or a scout out at the edges. She or he is centered and grounded hearth and home. That does not mean they are regressive or repressive, but rather that they do look to the broader well being of the community which is often missed by explorers and scouts.
The church may learn much from the work of Fr. Thew-Forrester, but I suspect being a priest and explorer is his call, not being a Bishop.
The larger problem is that we don't really know what we want Bishops to be. Are they Administrators? Are they disciplinarians? Just exactly what do we want from them?
Straight white males are hardly a safe bet these days.
Posted by Michael Russell
|
November 3, 2009 3:04 PM
Whatever side you take on the process and previous bishop-elect, I hope we can agree that the diocese and the people of the diocese are showing resilience, listening, and a willingness to move on. May we be listening to them.
I wish them well.
Regarding electing straight white males: there are slates in upcoming elections which guarantee that outcome. If nothing else, that doesn't smell good.
Posted by John B. Chilton
|
November 3, 2009 5:21 PM