The Lead

Edwin Barnes, former Bishop of Richborough:

The latest move from the Roman Catholic Church to extend an American experiment comes not a moment too soon. ... The offer to extend the Apostolic Constitution to England and elsewhere is very welcome. In America a similar constitution allows Episcopalian priests, some married men with families, to become Catholic priests. They have been given a prayer book, the Book of Divine Worship, that takes a great deal from the Book of Common Prayer but makes it entirely Catholic. Clearly Rome now sees the need to extend this provision to England.

The Holy See has come to realise that the Church of England is so divided that it must speak to separate groups within it. As Cardinal Levada says, these are Anglicans who have declared that “they share the common Catholic faith as it is expressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and accept the Petrine ministry as something Christ willed for the Church”. For many Catholic Anglicans, that is exactly where we stand.
...
Those of us compelled by conscience to leave will expect generous provision, not just financial, but also in the way of the transfer of churches and vicarages. The Archbishop of Canterbury has often berated the American Church for its meanness towards those who have left over issues such as the consecration of gay men and the ordination of women.

Barnes begins with a point that many on this side of the Atlantic have missed: Rome created "pastoral provision" from disaffected Episcopalians 25 years ago. What he does not say is that in terms of numbers who have taken advantage of that provision the results are underwhelming.

Barnes' second point strongly echoes Rowan Williams' concern that the Anglican Communion's "ecclesial deficit" makes ecumenical discussion with other denominations difficult. Out of this comes Williams' desire for an Anglican Covenant.

Barnes' scores a telling jab in his point over the transfer of churches and vicarages. It is not clear that Williams has ever understood why a moratorium on law suits over property undercuts the ecclesiology of the church. Barnes goes on his op-ed to say the General Synod of the C of E is "forcing" conservatives to leave. Will Williams counter that people are free to leave, but churches are not?

Finally, what does Barnes mean by financial generous provision? That's ambiguous. Endowments? The right of clergy to stay in the CoE pension system?

Read the Barnes op-ed in The Times.

Comments (7)

70 priests have become Roman Catholic. There are 7, count them 7, Anglican Rite congregations in the US. I believe three have their own building.

Posted by Jim Naughton | October 21, 2009 7:21 AM

Sounds like Rowan's chickens are coming home to roost.

Posted by Ann Fontaine | October 21, 2009 7:39 AM

Clayboy writes the letter the ABC might like to write here

Posted by Ann Fontaine | October 21, 2009 9:10 AM

Again, I don't believe that this is fundamentally a poaching move. The point here is to bring in the Traditional Anglican Communion as a group. They're a non-Anglican Communion group that wants to come in together like the Pastoral Provision but the Pastoral Provision only covers America--the base of the TAC is in Australia.

Posted by Derek Olsen | October 21, 2009 10:34 AM

(continued...)
+Barnes and any members of the CofE are simply icing on the cake--not the cake itself. What this pronouncement allows Barnes and others to do is to play chicken on the issue of women bishops. The main question in my mind is whether it's a bluff--as has been the case in the past...

Posted by Derek Olsen | October 21, 2009 10:37 AM

As long as they are shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic why not have Rowan and the Primates put out a welcoming covenant that accepts former Roman Catholics who believe in choice, divorce, birth control, papal fallibility, equality at the altar for all of God's creation, etc. into the Anglican communion? Rome can move further to the right, Anglicans further to the left and everyone will be happy, right? Isn't that what everyone's been saying for decades now?

Posted by Priscilla Cardinale | October 21, 2009 7:19 PM

Those of us compelled by conscience to leave will expect generous provision, not just financial, but also in the way of the transfer of churches and vicarages.

Eh, xBarnes is just blowing smoke. The CofE not only has civil law on their side (as TEC does---everywhere except Virginia, and that ruling's likely to be overturned) . . . they have Parliament (the real deedholders) too!

JC Fisher

Posted by tgflux | October 23, 2009 2:54 AM

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember personal info?

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)

CATEGORIES

Organizations