Antidisestablishmentarianism?

Further items exploring the ground of Jim Naughton's article wondering about Rowan Williams, civil partnerships, same sex marriage and the Church of England are linked from Thinking Anglicans:

The British Humanist Society asks if it is time to explore "disestablishment" of the Church of England:

If the Church of England wishes to be free from interference by government, it should work for disestablishment, the British Humanist Association (BHA) has commented today. The BHA has responded in light of remarks made by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, stating that the Church of England would not support permit civil partnership ceremonies to be held in its churches, nor would it support any attempts to have equal gay marriage.

Andrew Carey, quoted at Anglican Mainstream argues that "marriage" means man-woman-children and the church must resist any redefinition.

The essential nature of marriage as complementary union of a man and a woman, and the stable nature of marriage for children remain appealing. The need for both a mother and a father still strikes most people as elementary common sense. So all is not lost.

The Church must argue passionately and compassionately for the ideal of marriage. It is good for the whole of society.

A coalition of Evangelical groups have written an open letter to the Prime Minister:

Therefore, we must express our wholehearted opposition to any plans you may have to change the law in this area, and would request that your government thinks long and hard before legislating to permit same-sex marriage in the face of biblical teaching, our national history, and popular opinion. We would also repeat our opposition to allowing civil partnerships to be registered in churches.

The blog Cranmer tries to sort out what is really being said by the Archbishop and Lambeth Palace and the British government.
Permitting religious buildings to be used for the blessing of civil partnerships is not the same as imposing a redefinition of marriage upon the Established Church.

Re: headline -- I use any excuse to use that word which has fascinated me since childhood!

Posted by Ann Fontaine on March 1, 2011 6:35 PM | |
Comments (5)

Ann,

Isn't that one of the longest words in the English language?

:)

Posted by Richard E. Helmer [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 1, 2011 8:32 PM

"Permitting" (claimed to) equal "Imposing": I wonder what that Englishman Eric Blair (pen-name "George Orwell") would say about this Doublespeak?

JC Fisher

Posted by tgflux [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 1, 2011 8:40 PM

More to the point, anti-gay Christians want the State to do their dirty work for them. They won't have to face actual same-sex CHRISTIAN couples asking for weddings, will they, if this State perpetuates the blanket ban?

Yes, the State spares them The Unpleasantness of it all: "God bless the copper keeping the poofters out!"

Lord have mercy.

JC Fisher

Posted by tgflux [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 1, 2011 8:46 PM

That is what "they" told me in grade school, Richard!

Posted by Ann Fontaine [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 1, 2011 8:48 PM

Andrew Carey's "definitional" approach is a classical example of begging the question. It reminds me of the thwarted efforts of word-purists to resist the changes in meanings of words (based on their actual usage). It is as impossible a task as Canute trying to stop the tide. Reality will always win over false idealism. Andrew, welcome to the real world.

Posted by tobias haller [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 2, 2011 9:22 AM

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space