Bishops Blogging, March 17 House of Bishops

Bishop Dan Edwards, Nevada, post VI (Monday night):

...Tomorrow we will be discussing whether to consent to the consecration of the Bishop Elect of Northern Michigan. I know, like, and respect him. There are a couple of issues about liturgy that give me pause, but I still want to support him. I am afraid he will get nailed because of his Zen meditation practice and a general bias against the edgy way Northern Michigan operates. I pray it will go well.


Edwards, post VII:

The moratorium on same sex blessings is not likely to survive forever -- especially since Southern Cone and others have been violating the other moratorium with reckless abandon if not malice aforethought. They are now even in Nevada, though not in a particularly potent way. There will probably be some move to repeal the "restraint" resolution to comply with the moratoria at General Convention this summer. What to do?

On the one hand, if we just do a 180 and repeal what we did at last Convention, that will be destructive to the communion, tearing open a wound just beginning to heal. The theology committee is working on its report on human sexuality and that will not be out until next year, so taking dramatic action this year, just before the report is getting the cart before the horse.

On the other hand, LGBT folks all over the nation feel diminished by Prop 8. If we maintain the moratoria, that is likely to be seen as our Church aligning with the churches that backed Prop 8 -- absolutely untrue, but the appearance may matter more than the reality.

So what to do? I would be interested in hearing from you.


Bishop Kirk Smith, Arizona wrote on Tuesday,
One bishop addressed the "elephant under the table" the fact that some of our wealthiest dioceses pay very little to the larger church....Even in a time of economic duress, we can certainly afford to fund our mission. The money is there, what is lacking is the motivation. Maybe if we spent a little more time proclaiming the Gospel instead of crying "poor-mouth," we would be better off on every level-- parish, diocese, national church.
Bishop Carol Gallagher, first Native American (Cherokee) female bishop in the Episcopal Church writes this morning,
We humans need the light. And when bishops meet, it is often too easy to get mired in debates and conversations over canons than to delight in the companionship and shared ministry. We are at our best when we share our burdens and bring light to one another. We are at our worst when we draw lines in the sand and exclude the other from our circles.

Jesus encounters religious leaders who are trying to draw him into an argument, into the places of separation, exclusion and division. He answers them that his father is present with him - the God of all is in their very presence which brings an end to exclusion, separation and division. God seeks loving relationships and not those who plot in darkness and live by laws that shut others out.

Comments (3)

The bishop writes:

"The theology committee is working on its report on human sexuality and that will not be out until next year, so taking dramatic action this year, just before the report is getting the cart before the horse."

This seems to suggest that the House of Bishops Theology Committee is in a position to hold the bi-cameral General Convention hostage by failing to produce a report in time for it to shape debate in Anaheim in July. It makes it seem as though the bishops are saying that the Church will re-consider the moratorium that was adopted in haste and under pressure at the 2006 convention only when the bishops give the go-ahead.

I hope I am reading the bishop wrong, because if this is indeed the implication of these remarks, I can't tell you how badly this will be received by the wider Church.

RE Jim's comment, note that Bishop Dan is helping help in his discernment: "So what to do? I would be interested in hearing from you. I hope you won't post left vs right rants like you see on Stand Firm or some of those other unsavory blogs. But serious, sensitive, respectful expressions of opinion would be helpful to me in my discernment."

The moratorium on same sex blessings is not likely to survive forever

Moratorium on SSB: what is +Edwards talking about? The prospective moratorium in the Anglican Covenant? The non-binding resolutions of Lambeth? Moratoriums in individual dioceses, or other Anglican provinces?

The only TEC-wide moratorium I'm familiar with, is B033, and that refers to same-sex partnered bishops, alone. Good googly-moogly, we're not observing "moratorium-creep" again are we?

JC Fisher

Add your comments

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Reminder: At Episcopal Café, we hope to establish an ethic of transparency by requiring all contributors and commentators to make submissions under their real names. For more details see our Feedback Policy.

Advertising Space