New Standing Committee members
The Anglican Communion Office has announced two new members of the Standing Committee, and gives us a glimpse of how the Anglican Communion might operate should the Covenant pass.
The forthcoming Standing Committee meeting will welcome two new members from Asia and Africa: Bp Paul Sarker (Moderator of the Church of Bangladesh and Bishop of Dhaka) and Revd Canon Janet Trisk of South Africa (Rector of the Parish of St David, Prestbury in Pietermaritzburg, in the Diocese of Natal).The two new additions and the existing members face a packed agenda for their July meeting that includes reports on finance, mission, the Anglican Relief and Development Alliance, evangelism and church growth, and unity, faith and order including the progress of consideration of the Anglican Communion Covenant by the Provinces.
They will also be discussing Standing Committee membership issues including electing a successor to Bp Azad Marshall, Bishop of Iran, and noting the resignations of Archbishops Justice Akrofi and Henry Orombi.
The appointments questions:
1) Archbishop Orombi is treated as if he has resigned from the group, when it appears that all he wanted to do was register his displeasure at the presence of Americans by not showing up.
2) The Standing Committee will elect to fill Marshall's spot, but not the vacancy filled by Archbishop Anis resignation and Orombi's absence, indicating that they are treating the Anglican Consultative Council member and the members of the Primates group differently. What is the relationship between these two "instruments of communion" and the constitution of the Primates Group? Why are people who are not members of the ACC electing the ACC's representative to the Standing Committee?
Matthew Davies has filed a story for ENS.

Interesting that Archbishop Akrofi of West Africa, Orombi's alternate, has resigned, but Phillipa Amabale, a lay rep from West Africa has not.
Posted by Jim Naughton
|
July 2, 2010 10:45 AM
It is also interesting that, some sideline criticism notwithstanding, the Joint Committee seems prepared at first blush to receive Bishop Douglas in his membership without comment.
Marshall Scott
Posted by Execute
|
July 2, 2010 11:57 AM
However she was appointed, it gladdens me to see that Janet Trisk+ is now on the standing committee. I studied under Janet+ when she was the academic dean of the College of the Transfiguration in Grahamstown, South Africa. She is a strong advocate of the oppressed in Southern Africa, and I learned much about the process and efficacy of contextual theology from her.
Some of you may remember that it was Janet's+ maneuvering at a previous meeting of the ACC that managed to get part IV of the proposed covenant "detached" for a further round of consideration. Not sure if that has done any good in the long run, but it was a valiant effort to attempt a change in the tone of the final document.
Jason Cox
Posted by JasonC
|
July 2, 2010 12:30 PM
It's all rather confusing. The ACC has a constitution that calls for the ACC to "appoint" a Standing Committee, and by-laws that say that vacancies are filled by appointment of the Standing Committee. The Standing Committee includes the 5 primates who are members of the Standing Committee of the Primates -- and those primates are also ex officio members of the ACC. There's no official constitution for the Primates, so there's no indication of how their members of the Standing Committee are chosen.
My quote of the week: "A growing ecumenical theological consensus affirms the trinitarian understanding of God as the basis for ecclesial life, which is why church unity cannot be reduced to an issue of organizational structure." From the Romanian Orthodox theologian Ion Bria, in the "The Liturgy after the Liturgy."
Posted by Ruth Meyers
|
July 2, 2010 3:17 PM
There's no official constitution for the Primates, so there's no indication of how their members of the Standing Committee are chosen.
It has been reported before that the primates of an area or region choose one of themselves to the Standing committee. That is why it is reported that +Katharine's response to the ABC's private letter requesting that she stand down from the Standing Committee was that he had no authority to make such a request as she had been chosen by the primates of the Americas to the Committee.
Posted by Däˈvēd Äyān | David Allen
|
July 3, 2010 2:10 AM
Mathew Davies' article in ENS is required reading. For instance, it retraces the Orombi saga recalling that his office said that his letter in support of Anis was not a resignation letter. This begs the question, has the ABC decided to interpret the letter as a resignation to deny Orombi the opportunity to continue to not attend meetings?
Further, Davies does us the service of listing the membership of the Standing Committee. If you go the the Anglican Communion Office website, or elsewhere of the AC website you will search in vain for that information. The standing committee has no web presence. How peculiar an institution.
Posted by John B. Chilton
|
July 3, 2010 6:57 AM
Over at T19, Noll (who has very close ties to Orombi) points out "Article 3.6.5 reads: A Trustee-Member’s term of office automatically terminates if he or she: is absent without the permission of the Trustee-Members from two successive ordinary meetings and a majority of the Trustee-Members resolve that his or her office be vacated.”
Posted by John B. Chilton
|
July 3, 2010 12:39 PM