Global South Primates issue statement on CoE gay bishops policy

Members of the Global South Primates Steering Committee have issued a statement in response to the action of the Church of England House of Bishops confirming “that the requirements in the 2005 statement concerning the eligibility for ordination of those in civil partnerships whose relationships are consistent with the teaching of the Church of England apply equally in relation to the episcopate”. The statement follows, in full.

We, Primates of the Global South of the Anglican Communion, are deeply concerned and worried by the recent decision of the Church of England’s House of Bishops which approves that clergy living in civil partnerships can be candidates to the episcopate.There is already an ambiguity regarding civil partnerships per se. We learnt that most civil partnerships, according to the Office for National Statistics in the UK, take place among the most sexually active age group. In addition dissolutions of civil partnerships are now increasing especially in the last few years. This puts into question the motives behind this civil partnership and adds to our confusion in the Global South.

When the Church of England allowed civil partnerships in 2005, they said that “The House of Bishops does not regard entering into a civil partnership as intrinsically incompatible with holy orders, provided the person concerned is willing to give assurances to his or her bishop that the relationship is consistent with the standards for the clergy set out in Issues in Human Sexuality.” Now, with allowing candidates for episcopacy to do the same, to whom should they give assurances? Clarification on this point is needed.

Sadly, both the decision to permit clergy to enter civil partnerships and this latest decision which some call it a “local option,” are wrong and were taken without prior consultation or consensus with the rest of the Anglican Communion at a time when the Communion is still facing major challenges of disunity. It is contrary to “the inter-dependence” which we try to affirm between churches within the Communion. Moreover, it does not only widen the gap between the Church of England and Anglicans in the Global South, it also widens the gap between the Anglican Communion and our ecumenical partners. Further, it jeopardizes the relationship between us Anglicans living in the Global South and followers of other faiths, and gives opportunities to exploit such departure of moral standards that this type of decision may provide.

The Church, more than any time before, needs to stand firm for the faith once received from Jesus Christ through the Apostles and not yield to the pressures of the society! In other words, the Church needs to be “salt” and “light” and to present a distinctive message from that of the secular world around us.

We strongly urge the Church of England to reconsider this divisive decision.

+Mouneer Egypt

The Most Revd Dr. Mouneer Hanna Anis

Bishop of Egypt with North Africa and the Horn of Africa

Chairman, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Nicholas Abuja

The Most Revd Nicholas Okoh

Primate of All Nigeria Bishop of Abuja

Vice-Chairman, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Ian Maritius

The Most Revd Ian Ernest

Primate of the Indian Ocean Bishop of Mauritius

Hon. General Secretary, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Bolly Kuching

The Most Revd Datuk Bolly Lapok

Primate of South East Asia Bishop of Kuching

Hon. General Treasurer, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Stephen Yangon

The Most Revd Stephen Than Myint Oo

Primate of Myanmar Bishop of Yangon

Member, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Eluid Nairobi

The Most Revd Dr. Eluid Wabukala

Primate of Kenya Bishop of Nairobi

Member, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Bernard Matana

The Most Revd Bernard Nhatori

Primate of Burundi Bishop of Matana

Member, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Hector Chile

The Most Revd Hector “Tito” Zavala

Primate of the Southern Cone Bishop of Chile

Member, Global South Primates Steering Committee

++Henri Kinshasa

The Most Revd Kahwa Henri Isingoma

Primate of Congo Bishop of Kinshasa

Member, Global South Primates Steering Committee

The Archbishops of Kenya, Uganda and Nigeria have issued their own statements opposing the action.

Category : The Lead

Comment Policy
Our comment policy requires that you use your real name and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted

4 Comments
  1. Technically, I think the headline of this post should be “Some Global South Primates…” as there are primates whose churches are in the global south whose names are not on here. I’m not willing to let a small group of men claim they speak for a whole region of the world.

    One absence I note in particular is that of the primate of the Episcopal Church of Sudan. I also note that ECS and the Diocese of Salisbury in England have a 40-year link relationship that is a model for what companion relationships might look like. Coincidence?

    -Jesse

  2. Also, two crosses before the name? Is that a real thing? Please tell me it’s not. I don’t even think the pope does that.

  3. barbara snyder

    I read a funny blog post awhile back about the whole “+” and “++” and “+++” thing. Here’s a quote: “…the origin of the cross before or after a name comes from that era when we still wrote letters. And when those letters might take (gasp!) days to deliver. That cross then and now convey one thing, and one thing only – that the letter was sent with a blessing, by the person signing the letter.

    Here’s the whole post.

  4. John B. Chilton

    As the poster of this item, I debated whether to put “some” at the start. Instead I made it clear in the first sentence that this came from the Steering Committee of the GS Primates.

    It should also be noted that there have been times when a member of the steering committee has had his named signed, but he has said he had no knowledge of the letter.

    There are some points of plain illogic in the statement. Civil partnerships may have a high rate of dissolution among opposite sex couples who have the choice between marriage and a civil partnership. But to apply that to gay couples many of whom have been together a long with no choice at all for having their relationship recognized just doesn’t follow.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *