Episcopalian provides cover for Joint Chiefs of Staff

Colin Powell, Episcopalian, chooses his battles carefully. Today he issued this statement on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell:

In the almost seventeen years since the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” legislation was passed, attitudes and circumstances have changed. The principal issue has always been the effectiveness of the Armed Forces and order and discipline in the ranks. I strongly believe that this is a judgment to be made by the current military leadership and the Commander in Chief. It is also a judgment Congress must make. For the past two years, I have expressed the view that it was time for the law to be reviewed by Congress. I fully support the new approach presented to the Senate Armed Services Committee this week by Secretary of Defense Gates and Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I will be closely following future hearings, the views of the Service Chiefs and the implementation work being done by the Department of Defense.

It will be recalled that when it was enacted by executive DADT was a liberalization of the existing policy. Powell’s statement is entirely consistent with what he said in July 2009 on CNN’s State of the Union.

John McCain, on the other hand, appears to have changed his mind in the space of three years. As the Washington Post points out,

“The day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, ‘Senator, we ought to change the policy,’ then I think we ought to consider seriously changing it,” McCain said in October 2006 to an audience of Iowa State University students.

That day arrived Tuesday, with Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen testifying to senators after President Obama’s announcement that he would seek a congressional repeal of the 15-year-old policy.

In response, McCain declared himself “disappointed” in the testimony. “At this moment of immense hardship for our armed services, we should not be seeking to overturn the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy,” he said bluntly, before describing it as “imperfect but effective.”

Orrin Hatch says he’s open to repeal. Update: Hatch says that’s not what you say him say.

The administration plans to take most of the year studying implementation of the repeal. The gay community has been calling for Obama to fulfill his campaign promises on DADT. There is speculation that movement on the issue was prompted by the prospect of DADT dismissals that would force the administration to defend the policy in court, highlighting the delay in action on the campaign promise.

Relaxing the current restrictions on gays in the military will require action by Congress, specifically the repeal of the Military Personnel Eligibility Act of 1993.

Posted by
Category : The Lead

Comment Policy
Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted. We also ask that you limit your comments to no more than four comments per story per day.

  1. Bill Carroll

    I have to admit that I’m with Stanley Hauerwas on this one. LGBT folk should not give up the moral high ground by getting involved with the military. Would that we had a few more Christians who were willing to follow the teaching and example of Jesus here.

    Practicing Christians are far more dangerous to military discipline and morale. They love their enemies and question orders.

    The Empire will always be able to find plenty of folks willing to fight for it. Christians have a different vocation. We may pray and work for the peace of Babylon, but we are in fact citizens of a different country and followers of a different Lord.

  2. tgflux

    To have moral high ground, Bill, you have to be FREE to CHOOSE its alternative.

    [Rather like—if I may be so bold—the moral high ground in CHOOSING to give birth to a baby w/ severe (or even fatal) birth defects, as opposed to being compelled to do so?]

    JC Fisher

Comments are closed.