Decoding letters from the former bishop of Pittsburgh

Lionel Deimel of the Episcopal Diocese of PIttsburgh has analyzed the latest letter from the former bishop of Pittsburgh, Robert Duncan. He notes that it is important to remember that Duncan calls his breakaway diocese The Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh and the legitimate Diocese the “new” diocese. Deimel writes:

Discredited former Pittsburgh bishop Robert Duncan wrote to his flock February 27, 2009. (The letter can be read here, and, as I have not quoted extensively from it below, I do recommend reading all of the Duncan epistle before continuing to read this essay.) These missives seem to get progressively longer, more self-serving, and more pathetic over time. Nevertheless, this one deserves careful analysis. One might easily miss its objectives, given its wealth of detail.


The purpose of the letter, I suggest, … is to increase the likelihood that Duncan and his supporters will be able to hold on to as much property (real and personal) as possible. The strategy employed is twofold. On one hand, the letter is intended to advance the legal theory by which Duncan hopes to avoid an adverse ruling in the Calvary lawsuit. On the other hand, it seeks to sidestep the property agreement already in place as a result of that litigation in favor of negotiating something else that might not leave the Duncan faction empty-handed.

There is actually a refreshing forthrightness in the letter. Duncan clearly identifies issues critical to the current litigation, even if he misrepresents them in order to promote the tortured legal theory that represents his only hope of avoiding an adverse and embarrassing judgment by the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas…

Read the details

Posted by
Category : The Lead
Tags :

Comment Policy
Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted. We also ask that you limit your comments to no more than four comments per story per day.

  1. Richard III

    Bob Duncan is trying to pull the wool over the Court’s and other’s eyes by proffering that the “real” Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh is in fact the one that departed for the greener pastures of the Southern Cone and those remaining faithful to TEC are now attempting to claim ownership of property that isn’t theirs. What’s he been smoking? Does he really believe this ruse will persuade any reasonable person that what he’s doing isn’t just twisting the truth for his benefit to the detriment of TEC and it’s diocese.

    Richard Warren

  2. Peter Pearson

    How utterly sad. Does Bob Duncan really believe these things he says? Is winning at any cost the point here? Personally I believe that the willingness to sacrifice everything for what is right is a true measure of one’s commitment. These folks want it all and have obviously enlisted the help of some experts to find legal loop holes which they have been constructing for a long time to prepare for this day. “Bob Pittsburgh,” it matters how you win or lose…

Comments are closed.