What has the Church had to say about the war in Iraq?
By Peter Carey
I was recently at a gathering of church leaders and the question arose, “what has the church had to say about the ongoing Iraq War?” While I realize that there may be churches that have taken on the issue of the war, for the most part, I believe we (and I include myself) have done a poor job to take on the issue of war in any kind of a helpful or constructive way. (If your church has engaged the question that is awesome; let me know what you’re doing!)
Of course, there are a variety of perspectives about war that emerge from the Christian tradition, and preachers and church leaders would do well to recognize that pacifists, veterans, active duty officers, as well as victims of war sit in our pews. But still, couldn’t we have the courage to examine the tradition of just war and the various forms of pacifism and do this in a way that could raise the tenor of discussion? Why haven’t our churches taken up the subject of the war in a more direct way? Are we fearful that any criticism of foreign policy will lead us to an I.R.S. audit (such as happened at All Saints Episcopal Church, Pasadena)? Or, are we worried that if we try to be prophetic someone might post it on Youtube and we would be labeled as “anti-American”?
Fear may be at the root of our reluctance, but there may also be deeper reasons for the church’s reluctance to take on war and violence. I believe that Western Christianity would receive a mixed verdict in terms of how it has addressed global issues of violence. All too often, the Church has become enmeshed in the power structures of society and has not offered alternatives to the dominant world-view.
In studying these questions in seminary last year, my thesis advisor, Rev. Dr. Michael Battle, helped me to see that one area on which to focus attention in order to address global issues of violence is on the virtues within Christian spirituality. Fear often leads to violence. This fear may be loss of possessions, of our way of life, or of our sense of security. If those of us in the church focused on the virtues of the monastic life such as poverty, chastity, obedience, work, study and worship, then a more grounded, nonviolent way of life may result. The bumper sticker, “Live Simply So that Others May Simply Live” is a secular outgrowth of these same virtues.
What if we worked to understand that one’s possessions, one’s family and friends, one’s nation and one’s very self are all gifts from God? If we truly see that this is all gift, that we deserve none of it, would we still be so willing to act violently to cling to it?
As one of my heroes, the preacher and activist William Sloane Coffin said, “People say, ‘I just want what I deserve; what is coming to me!’ but they don’t! We’re all in deep trouble if we were to get what we truly deserve.” Is it our fear of loss, ultimately our fear of death that leads us to choose the wrong path and exclude and dehumanize others rather than embrace and love them?
Ideally, our corporate worship is a corrective to an overly individualized spirituality. Our corporate worship ideally brings us together across those divides of class, of race, of politics, of theology. In Christ we are persons who are tied up with one another as parts of a body, and not as mere individuals. We need our neighbors and our neighbors need us. In thinking we can reach God on our own, without any need for either corporate fellowship, or love for others, we are no longer worshiping the God who calls us to “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul and mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” We become islands unto ourselves, and our own dehumanization and violence runs amok. You may remember those lines of Paul Simon and Art Garfunkle who sang of the dehumanizing consequences of a individualized world view:
I am a rock, I am an island.
I’ve built walls, A fortress deep and mighty, That none may penetrate.
I have no need of friendship; friendship causes pain. It’s laughter and it’s loving I disdain.
A recapturing of the early Western Christian spirituality is needed in order to encourage people to look beyond themselves, to see that who they are is bound up with others.
I began by asking “Why haven’t our churches taken up the subject of the war in a more direct way?” What’s stopping us from even engaging in discourse? Perhaps we are afraid of what might happen to our institution if we took on such a controversial issue. Perhaps people would leave the church. On the other hand, maybe people would see that the church is actually engaging with some of the key ethical and political questions of our time. Perhaps people would begin to see the church actually living out the gospel and come knocking in droves. Who knows?
From our biblical and theological tradition, the church has a unique understanding of humanity as being deeply relational. In addition, we have a rich biblical and theological tradition to draw upon when it comes to issues of violence and war. Of course, the church is not blameless or without fault when it comes to violence and war. However, from the prophets to Jesus, and from St. Augustine to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Church has had something to say and proclaim about violence and war. What if we were more willing to draw upon this tradition? Cultivating a robust corporate spirituality might give us the courage to lift up helpful and hopeful voices within the church on these important issues of violence and war. Isn’t it time to make our voices heard?
The Rev. Peter M. Carey is the school chaplain at St. Catherine's School for girls in Richmond, Virginia and is also on the clergy staff at St. Mark's Episcopal Church in Richmond. He blogs at Santos Woodcarving Popsicles.

Good reflections, and I think you're right on about cultivating virtues--particularly the monastic ones--but you're also missing a large piece of the traditional Christian just war theory: the anthropological.
Our just war tradition is built on the notion that humanity as it currently exists dwells within a state of sin. We should strive to be more virtuous as people and as societies. But if a neighboring state with territorial ambitions, a hunger for resources, or just plain megalomania decides to take advantage of our virtue the tradition allows us a response. (Heck, forget theology--your history books will provide examples of these three motives and a whole lot more...) As a result, defensive war (that matches additional criteria) is considered "just". The war in Iraq was sold as a defensive war.
While the tradition recognizes defensive war as just, pre-emptive war is not. According to classical just war theory, then, the War with Iraq is not just.
However--classical theory also never had to grapple with personally portable weapons of mass destruction and thought in terms of nation-states. Transnational ideological movements just weren't in the picture.
Now--don't get me wrong; I'm not trying to argue for the war. What I am suggesting, though, is that for a Christian response to be taken seriously by modern Americans it must go beyond a simple call to virtue. I completely agree with a call to virtue--but that's not sufficient when it comes to the safety of my home and my daughters. (Again, history can provide graphic examples...)
This is a discussion we need to be having, and we need to be having in public, and while it should start with a call to social virtue it cannot end there.
Posted by Derek Olsen
|
May 15, 2008 9:08 AM
Posted for Peter Carey:
Derek,
Thanks so much for your post. Your concise and helpful discussion of the basics of Just War theory are helpful and just exactly what I would hope my article might provoke. I wholeheartedly agree that "this is a discussion that we need to be having, and we need to be having it in public, and while it should start with a call to social virtue it cannot end there." I would love to see some good discussion and debate about where people stand on Just War, and where people stand on pacifism as well. These are elements of our Christian tradition that should be brought out in the public discourse.
Thanks,
Peter+
Posted by Jim Naughton
|
May 15, 2008 10:26 AM
Thanks for getting the ball rolling, Peter. I was struggling to frame my response, but I see I share Derek's thoughts and he's expressed them much better than I ever could.
On a more frivolous note, I always the heard the words in "I am a rock" this way:
I have no need of friendship; friendship causes pain.
Its laughter and its loving I disdain.
i.e., friendship has laughter and loving.
Posted by John B. Chilton
|
May 15, 2008 11:40 AM
Thanks, Peter (And John--and I doubt that...).
I'm afraid I didn't give a very thorough accounting of the tradition; I just touched on a few of its points as I remember them from my undergrad days.
Such theory is both complex--due to the very complicated nature of the subject--and disputed. As a result, it often simply isn't taught either to laypeople or to clergy. As a result, many of us are left without having a framework of how other concerned Christians have wrestled with the issues in the past.
The best "short answer" on the conditions for the start of a just war I know is in the current Roman Catholic Catechism which lists four basic points. And it goes from there.
Hmm... Maybe one of our ethicists should write a Cafe piece to build on this topic for us...
Posted by Derek Olsen
|
May 15, 2008 12:29 PM
The General Convention in 2006 spoke to this in resolution D020. It's a detailed resolution, worth our review, speaking both to the opinion of our bishops that this is not a "just war," and to steps for both General Convention and all Episcopalians to take. That our parishioners don't know about this statement is, in no small part, our fault as leaders in the Church.
Posted by Marshall Scott
|
May 15, 2008 5:29 PM
I realized that fellow Daily Episcopalian columnist George Clifford wrote about Just War as it might apply to the Iraq War back in June of 2007 ... well worth another read !
http://www.episcopalcafe.com/daily/politics/confessing_the_sin_of_making_u.php
Now, how can we get these conversations going in our pews and adult forums!!??
Peter Carey+
Posted by Peter Carey
|
May 15, 2008 11:53 PM
Many congregations have had these conversations. I've been to them in both congregations I've been part of since 2003, both times in Adult Forum.
Posted by B. Snyder
|
May 16, 2008 11:12 AM
B. Snyder,
Thanks for noting that many congregations have had these conversations. How did the conversations go in the two churches that you attended? Did the conversations continue beyond the adult forum...? I'd love to hear how they went, whether anyone's views were changed, or broadened, and whether action was taken. How did you find them?
I agree that there have been presentations and perhaps conversations, but I wonder if these can continue and become more sustained ...
...what do you think?
Peter+
Posted by Peter Carey
|
May 16, 2008 10:14 PM
They have been good; at the first one I went to (following 9/11, so actually it was 2001 or 2002, not 2003) a newcomer mentioned that he had never seen a discussion in which people disagreed about something so important and potentially incendiary without getting nuts about it. He was impressed, I mean.
The most recent one was about a year ago in a different parish. It was on the topic of "Just War" itself, and of course Iraq was discussed in that regard. Also good, I thought, and we always learn something new. We also had a recent one about the topic of "forgiveness" in the corporate and national sense, and that was excellent, too. We read something that Fr. Bryan at Creedal Christian just posted about, actually. That was one of the best forums I've been to.
Posted by B. Snyder
|
May 17, 2008 3:32 PM