And a virgin shall conceive
By Ann Fontaine
Today, March 25 is the celebration of the Annunciation. It is the day when the church remembers Gabriel’s visit to Mary and reveals to her that she will be the mother of Jesus who will become the Christ. The power of the Holy Spirit will fill her and cause her to conceive. The annunciation is one of the most popular topics of art, especially in Medieval and Renaissance art – often depicting her as conceiving through her ear. The mystery of it has confounded many – with some turning to worship Mary as Theotokos, the God Bearer, and others turning away in disgust at such blatant mythology.
My early life in the Episcopal Church was one that rejected any sort of talk of Mary as anything other than the mother of Jesus. Mary, meek and mild, was as far as our minister (never call him a priest) would go. I was thoroughly steeped in anti-Mary thinking. However, our neighborhood was near a Roman Catholic grade school and many of my playmates were Catholic. They would write JMJ at the top of their schoolwork, which until corrected by one boy, I thought were the initials of a girlfriend. The effect of my church’s and my playmates’ very different beliefs about Mary left me with a sense that there was something forbidden about Mary.
When I returned to the church in my 30s, I found that the creed was problematic for me. I could not really say the part “conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary” without mentally crossing my fingers. I just did not believe it. However, I began to accept the creed as a statement across time and in community. I decided I could say it because we said “we” and I thought someone in the community and in the history of the church believed it. I was stuck at that point of my journey with Mary when I became friends with a person who prayed regularly to Mary and found that a much more satisfying connection with God than all the male imagery. Her passion for God and her deep prayer life affected me. I began to explore the place of Mary in my life.
The first book I read was Herbert O’Driscoll’s Portrait of a Woman: meditations on the Mother of Our Lord. The next one was Ann Johnson’s Miryam of Nazareth: woman of strength and wisdom. Suddenly, I was confronted by a powerful woman who lived fully into her faith and answered God’s call by choice. I had never considered any image other than “meek and mild.” I learned that her name, Mary – Miryam – has a root meaning of rebellion. Johnson’s research revealed itself in her poetry, each poem written in the form she calls a Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55). I was amazed that I had missed this Mary in my education and formation in the church.
The current stage of my life with Mary began when I was teaching a class on the creeds. We were using Joan Chittister’s In Search of Belief as a basis for the study. I was facilitating the discussion and reading along with the class when we came to the chapter on “virgin birth.” Rather than explore the modern science or pre-scientific ideas about conception, Chittister spoke about the amazing story the creed tells about who are worthy to bear Christ into the world.
As I understand what she is saying, the fact that Mary was a young woman, a virgin when God called her to bear Jesus shows us the nature of God’s relationship to us. In Mary’s day she was seen as property. She was vulnerable in a culture that did not value women and especially not girls. Their value came from their connection to a man, first to their fathers and then to their husbands and their ability to bear sons. Today young girls are still at risk in many countries to be sold or bartered away. Even in the United States they are easily dismissed as less than anyone else. Although changes have been made – movies, popular music and media off all sorts views females as objects and not agents of their own lives.
This is why the creed’s affirmation of Mary is so amazing. God chooses the least in the social hierarchy to be the one to bear God into the world. It is a statement by the church of the worth of the individual in the face of cultures who say “not worthy.”
As to Mary as a vehicle for our prayers, I love having Our Lady of Guadalupe and other images of her around. I currently experience Mary as a companion rather than an object of worship. I see her as priest, the first person to offer the broken body of Christ up to the world. I understand the need for a feminine face of the Holy and how that emerges no matter the suppression of that aspect of God. The book of Proverbs speaks of Wisdom who companioned God from the beginning of creation. The feminine face of God who created both female and male in the image of God, continues to surface in our worship and in our dreams and even in humor:
Michelangelo was up on the scaffolding in the Sistine, a little bored, a little tired. He looks down, sees an old lady kneeling in prayer, and decides to have some fun. His voice echoes through the Sistine. "This is Jesus. How may I help you?"
The woman showed no sign of hearing him.
He said again, "This is Jesus; how may I help you?"
Still no response
So he tried one more time. "This is Jesus. How may I help you?"
The woman looked up at heaven and said,
"Shut up—Can’t you see I'm talking to your mama!
I am not quite sure where my journey with Mary will end. I still have more questions than answers. Recently I received this poem from a friend and it opens up all sorts of new thinking about Mary. Perhaps this is a good thing for the Feast of the Annunciation.
It seems I must have been more fertile than most
to have taken that wind-blown
thistledown softly-spoken word
into my body and grown big-bellied with it.
Nor was I the first: there had been
rumours of such goings-on before my turn
came - tales of swansdown. Mine
had no wings or feathers actually
but it was hopeless trying to convince them.
They like to think it was a mystical
encounter, although they must know
I am not of that fibre - and to say I was
'troubled' is laughable.
What I do remember is a great rejoicing,
my body's arch and flow, the awe,
and the ringing and singing in my ears -
and then the world stopped for a little while.
But still they will keep on about the Word,
which is their name for it, even though I've
told them that is definitely
not how I would put it.
I should have known they'd try to take
possession of my ecstasy and
swaddle it in their portentous terminology.
I should have kept it hidden in the dark
web of my veins...
Though this child grows in me -
not unwanted certainly, but
not intended on my part; the risk
did not concern me at the time, naturally.
I must be simple to have told them anything.
Just because I stressed the miracle of it
they've rumoured it about the place that I'm
immaculate - but then they always were afraid
of female sexuality.
I've pondered these things lately in my mind.
If they should canonise me
(setting me up as chaste and meek and mild)
God only knows what nonsense
they'll visit on the child.
Sylvia Kantaris From Dirty Washing, Bloodaxe 1989. ©Sylvia Kantaris Used by permission
The Rev. Ann Fontaine, Diocese of Wyoming, keeps what the tide brings in. She is the author of Streams of Mercy: a meditative commentary on the Bible.

Thanks so much for this! It's great to see a progressive female priest speak about Mary; too often Mary language is only on the lips of Anglo-Catholic men and we can use some additional voices to help round out our perspective!
That having been said, there is a dearth of talk about Mary in our church which I think is a shame given the importance we rightly place on the notion of Incarnation. Can we be taking Incarnation seriously if we aren't also thinking and talking about Mary? As the only major ecclesial body that 1) talks about and (in some places) venerates Mary and 2) ordains women, I think we as Anglicans have a special perspective on the Blessed Virgin to offer to the rest of the Church.
I put some thoughts on her together recently in light of a debate on the "co-redemptrix" issue: A Perspective on Mary from Ascetical Theology. (The real meat is under the third subheading...)
Posted by Derek Olsen
|
March 25, 2009 9:36 AM
Ann,
This is exactly the kind of recovery of Mary as parent, as mother, as inquiring woman by the rest of us going on in interfaith and Protestant circles not to mention RC ones too (see "Truly Our Sister" by Elizabeth A. Johnson). Remember, the first thing she said to Gabriel --often overlooked on days like today--(Luke 1:34) is, "How can this be since I have not had sexual relations with a man?" A thinking, breathing, gutsy interrogation!
Posted by deirdregood
|
March 25, 2009 11:19 AM
Enjoyed your reflection, Ann. It parallels my journey with Mary.
Is it just me, and aren't most women in scripture gutsy? Eve, Sarah (talk about salty: Gen. 18:12), Rebecca, Mary Mag, the woman who tugged at Jesus' garment....?
Posted by John B. Chilton
|
March 25, 2009 11:38 AM
For some time in my life, I didn't believe in God and, after I came back to the Church, I still had a great amount of skepticism regarding many doctrines that sound so unrealistic to some. And I don't really know how to explain how I came to believe in them, other than by faith. The Virgin Mary, in the midst of all that, has been a very pleasing companion and intercessor, and I enjoy very much creating all sorts of imagery about her. Today, just the fact of thinking about the Blessed Lady makes my heart smile.
In that regard, I see many parallels between this reflection and my own life and admire the author's willingness to be honest and engage us in conversation with her.
I have to say, however, that I see the last poem as rather contradictory given the flux of the text, and the author's encounter with Mary. I especially find it a tad troublesome, not because it questions traditional dogmas and conceptions about her, but because of the tone that it uses to make such statements. Of course, we have free speech, and the author has the right to post whatever she wants, but, in some cases, and especially when we deal with so delicate matters, there is always the possibility of someone getting offended by that, especially when it's presented as a paraphrase of a person seen by holy by so many people. It didn't bother me that much, but I tried to read it again from the viewpoint of a person (the poet, not Ann+) who probably saw Mary as a tool for diminishing women in society. At first, however, I felt it was really unnecessary, and that it did no good to the much more reasonable and heartfelt reflection that came before it.
I particularly don't see any reason why we shouldn't embrace traditional views of Mary in our days. It is a fact that there have been wonderful works produced about Mary more recently (and I especially recommend two: "Living the Magnificat" with a foreword by the Very Rev. Jeffrey John, and "The Hail Mary and the Feminine Divine" by Leonardo Boff), but there's nothing wrong about her being "meek, graceful, and humble." Of course, she was more than that, and we've been rediscovering other Marian virtues as well. She was a very strong and determined woman, for sure. But meekness and humility are attributes of Our Lord Jesus Christ himself (Mt 11:29), and as imitators of Christ, we have to seek them. Mary surely did it, and if some people have used her to justify prejudices and the humiliation of women, this was done despite of Mary's witness and not because of Mary's witness. From what I learn from Tradition and Scripture about her, I see her as a very strong and determined woman, and yet humble and discreet. A true saint, a priest (like the author said), and a great example for all of us. The fact that so many see her as the heat of the Communion of Saints just proves that God sees all of us, women and men, as equals. Her centrality in the life of the church, and even Roman Catholic doctrines (which we don't follow) just emphasize this fact even more. Her depiction in art and iconography is a visible example of the place other women should have had in the Church, if we had been faithful to the witness of the Gospel, and, if for centuries we ignored that, its our - and not Mary's - fault.
Posted by Luiz Coelho
|
March 25, 2009 8:12 PM
Ann,
It makes such sense to see Mary as a priest, the bearer and birther of Christ's body in ways that leave us ordained clergy speechless and astonished unless we ignore it and pretend it's male prerogative.
And I like it very much that you ask us to remember woman as property, bartered women, sold girls (and with the sale, the revelation the heartlessness of 'commercial value').
My wife does AIDS work in Africa, telecommuting 11 months of the year. Daily conversations with the epidemic's survivors and a remarkable team of Africans working for AIDS widows, AIDS orphans, people now in ARV's, and AIDS prevention keep revealing deeper layers of how much our global struggles reverberate with denials of the full humanity and equal worth of women and girls.
So good to read this on the Annunciation. Thank you.
Posted by Donald Schell
|
March 25, 2009 11:29 PM
Thanks for this post. I've had what I thought to be an odd fascination with Mary and all things Mary for a while. Elizabeth Johnson's _Truly Our Sister_ was a great help to me to help put Mary within the context of my faith.
[First commenters -- remember that our policy is that you sign your FULL name. - eds.]]
Posted by Jolene
|
March 26, 2009 10:23 AM
Thank you Anne for these words about Mary. My journey with Mary parallels yours. And thank you for pointing out that Mary was the first priest. It is nice to see someone else who believes that too.
Shawna Atteberry
Posted by shawnarenee
|
March 26, 2009 12:07 PM